Re: Please review the draft for January's report

2024-02-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. We didn't know what to do with the FOSDEM stuff (technically February, not January so I will do a separate post tomorrow). Anyway, please share the

Please review the draft for January's report

2024-02-05 Thread Chris Lamb
Hey folks, Please glance over the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-01/?draft … which you can also do via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2024-01.md

Re: Please review the draft for January's report

2023-02-05 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-01/ .. and also consider retweeting:

Re: Please review the draft for January's report

2023-02-03 Thread Akihiro Suda
Thanks! 2023年2月3日(金) 22:20 Chris Lamb : > Hey kpcyrd, > > >> Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: > > > > There was a recent update on rb-general@ by Akihiro Suda about > > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in BuildKit v0.11 that I consider very noteworthy > > (although it was

Re: Please review the draft for January's report

2023-02-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Hey kpcyrd, >> Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: > > There was a recent update on rb-general@ by Akihiro Suda about > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in BuildKit v0.11 that I consider very noteworthy > (although it was technically in February). :) Great idea, especially as

Re: Please review the draft for January's report

2023-02-02 Thread kpcyrd
On 2/2/23 21:14, Chris Lamb wrote: Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: There was a recent update on rb-general@ by Akihiro Suda about SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH in BuildKit v0.11 that I consider very noteworthy (although it was technically in February). :)

Please review the draft for January's report

2023-02-02 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi all, Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-01/?draft … or via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2023-01.md I intend to publish it no

Re: Please review the draft for January's report

2022-02-05 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If possible, please share the following link: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-01/ .. and also consider retweeting:

Please review the draft for January's report

2022-02-03 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi all, Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-01/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2022-01.md I intend to publish it

Re: Please review the draft for January's report

2021-02-04 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed. Please share the following URL: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-01/ Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please

Please review the draft for January's report

2021-02-02 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi all, Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-01/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/blob/master/_reports/2021-01.md I intend to publish it

Re: Please review the draft for January's report

2020-02-10 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed. Please share the following URL: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-01/ Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, please

[rb-general] Please review the draft for January's report

2020-02-08 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi all, Apologies for the short delay here (blame FOSDEM...!) but please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-01/?draft … or, via the Git repository itself: