Re: [rb-general] Addresses in (I)Python output

2019-09-24 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer via rb-general
I agree that having the search-and-replace code in a central place (similar to the existing fix for memory addresses in API documentation [0]) rather than per-package is a good idea. However, that place should ideally be IPython/Jupyter not Sphinx, as this also affects standalone .ipynb files

Re: [rb-general] Addresses in (I)Python output

2019-09-24 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Rebecca > I agree that having the search-and-replace code in a central place > (similar to the existing fix for memory addresses in API documentation > [0]) rather than per-package is a good idea. However, that place should > ideally be IPython/Jupyter not Sphinx, as this also affects