Chris Lamb (2019-06-05):
> I naturally understand your hesitation but on the other hand I would
> truly love to see this in buster. Indeed, we may actually have done
> enough work to boast about having reproducible installer images for
> the upcoming release (!) although without testing on our
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm a little wary with possibly merging this late in the release cycle,
> so I'd rather get see that looked at after Buster is out.
I naturally understand your hesitation but on the other hand I would
truly love to see this in buster. Indeed, we may actually have done
Hi,
Chris Lamb (2019-06-05):
> Apologies for the delay in getting back to you all here.
>
> I've got this working locally here although we require the following
> change to the gen-sources.list.udeb script. Basically, we need print
> three columns if we have "[options]", otherwise we just print
[adding rb-general@lists.reproducible-builds.org to CC]
Hi Colin,
> This is all from dubious memory, but I suspect my setup at the time was
> roughly an amd64 system with:
>
> deb [arch=amd64]
> deb
>
> ... on the grounds that my local partial mirror didn't have space for
> both amd64
