ned DH
addon will soon gain the functional equivalent of the above line?
(Unrelated, but I find it almost impossible to spell "laby" without
an "m"…)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
ave followed-up to the issue there:
https://bugs.debian.org/951216#10
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > So, I heard a vague rumour that this "buster" thing was released? I
> > > was thus wondering whether we could apply my patch from:
> > >
> > > https://bugs.debian.org/926242#127
> > >
> > > :)
> >
esting to me that
the first timestamp in the debian/changelog was not chosen, á la
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH.
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
mmdebstrap likely has this feature to facilitate building images from
snapshot.debian.org where, as you know, the Release file will be on an
essentially arbitrary date.
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.
dev/stdin
^^^
> OK, this really is unfun.
Hopefully we can keep this list friendly and welcoming to all
regardless of your understandable frustration.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chri
prior to publishing. If you
currently do not have access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.or
Thanks for bringing #796257 to my attention. I have also made a remark
in the draft for our February report so that others become aware of it
too; often publicising the issue to some degree can encourage an
elegant solution ... or simply a timely one.
Regards,
--
,''`.
:
Dear all,
> Ugh, sorry about that!
>
> It should work now!
Thanks; works for me… as you can see here:
https://i.imgur.com/UEqbiR4.png
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-01/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
[18] and is
essential for identifying fixes and causes of nondeterministic
behaviour.
[17] https://diffoscope.org
[18] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/reproducible.html
This month, diffoscope versions 135 and 136 were uploaded to Debian
unstable by Chris Lamb. He also made the following c
or the official Docker images so
thanks for that. :)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
rb-general@lists.reproducible-builds.org mailing list
To change
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-02/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
ase. I've pushed version 139 now to the right place
and it ought to appear shortly (the Jenkins instance that populates
this directory from the git-lfs repository is being restarted).
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-03/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
ted/restarted on my machine, so a
bunch of things were slightly botched/mismatched in this and the
latest diffoscope release. I am pretty confident this was just a one-
time "thing".
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-04/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
In fact, it was quite the opposite — I was trying to ensure
that your views were accurately represented. I suspect I share much of
the frustration that underlies this.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
inciple, hence this minor
remark. Am willing to be corrected either way.)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
diffoscope
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope
- Issues and feature requests
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues
- Contribution instructions (eg. to file an issue)
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for August's Reproducible Builds report:
I've just published this at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-08/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I've made an initial step of taking my patch from:
> >
> > https://bugs.debian.org/926242#127
> >
> > … and submitting it as a MR on salsa here:
> >
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/m
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 159 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Show "ordering differences only" in strings(1) output.
(Closes: reproducible-builds/diffoscope#216)
* Don't alias output from "o
to look at other distributions' solutions that
you may have inadvertently been implying.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published. Please share the following URLs:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-09/
https://twitter.com/ReproBuilds/status/1313069476653522945
Regards,
--
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 161 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Fix failing testsuite: (Closes: #972518)
- Update testsuite to support OCaml 4.11.1. (Closes: #972518)
- Reapply Black and bump minimum
scope/issues
- Contribution instructions (eg. to file an issue)
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > > My current plan is (1) breathing a little, (2) getting the needed
> > > bugfixes into 10.1.
> >
> > Whoops, I'm afraid I totally neglected to followup on this so I
> > apologise this got stalled. Anyway, anything I can do to help?
>
&
to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 146 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Refactor .changes and .buildinfo handling to show all details (including
the GPG header and footer components), even when referenced files
roducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
ow if you have suggestions if they could be improved.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
her
communities so we can work together towards common goals.
Understanding what other communities' incentives are is therefore
highly instructive in working out how we can collaborate, and I don't
believe I have a firm grasp on the Android perspective.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 155 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Bump Python requirement from 3.6 to 3.7 - most distributions are either
shipping3.5 or 3.7, so supporting 3.6 is not somewhat unnecessary and also
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for July's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-07/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬠⬠Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org ð
⬠â¬
o
sa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/merge_requests/13
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
-Depends.
I do not know why this does not appear on the official buildds nor
your local machine, so I appreciate that I am not answering your
actual question.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for June's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-06/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 150 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Don't crash when listing entries in archives if they don't have a listed
size (such as hardlinks in .ISO files).
(Closes: reproducible-builds
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 151 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb]
.
* Improvements and bug fixes:
.
- Pass the absolute path when extracting members from SquashFS images as we
run the command with our working
the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 148 includes the following changes:
[ Daniel Fullmer ]
* Fix a regression in the CBFS comparator due to changes in our_check_output.
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Add a remark in the deb822 handling re
.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
uot;adding" could be implying).
Indeed, Debian packages should be respecting flags set from via the
dpkg-buildflags mechanism, so specifically asking about
-fdebug-prefix-map at all sounds like something else is going and we
aren't asking the right question here yet.
Best wishes,
--
o
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 149 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Update tests for file 5.39. (Closes: reproducible-builds/diffoscope#179)
* Downgrade the tlsh warning message to an "info" lev
tors members will be able to provide some
feedback.
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for May's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published. Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-05/
Please consider retweeting or promoting:
https://twitter.com/ReproBuilds/sta
an.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope
- Issues and feature requests
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues
- Contribution instructions (eg. to file an issue)
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 153 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Drop some legacy argument styles; --exclude-directory-metadata and
--no-exclude-directory-metadata have been replaced with
--exclude
ixed earlier this year in browserify-lite:
https://github.com/andrewrk/browserify-lite/pull/14
… but there remain issues in other tools such as uglifyjs and others.
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
the above fits your overall goals.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
, I believe that there is a default.nix hook script
("set-source-date-epoch-to-latest.sh") that is designed to solve this,
although I cannot be sure.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
rg/news/diffoscope-146-released/
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 152 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
.
* Bug fixes:
.
- Don't require zipnote(1) to determine differences in a .zip file as we
can use libarchive directly.
.
Reporting
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 156 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Update PPU tests for compatibility with Free Pascal versions 3.2.0 or
greater. (Closes: #968124)
* Emit a debug-level logging message when our
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 162 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Don't depends on radare2 in the Debian autopkgtests as it will not be in
bullseye due to security considerations (#950372). (Closes: #975313
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for November's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-11/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
builderd had more exposure
> in the reproducible builds project.
>
> There've only been 26h between the two mails, I'm not part of the
> academic community and I'm only working on reproducible builds in my
> personal spare time after my day job, I didn't have the time to check
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 163 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Bug fixes & new features:
- Normalise "ret" to "retq" in objdump output to support multiple versions
of obd
reprint or Arxiv version
> we could read?
It's not quite at that stage yet, but I will of course followup with a
preprint when that is more appropriate.
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
o suggest that we do a specific
publicity boost based on this..)
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
roject to
make large-scale software collections/supply-chains/ecosystems
reproducible, and we also describe the affinity between reproducibility
efforts and quality assurance (QA).
More news when we have it, of course...
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-buil
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for October's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-10/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬠⬠Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org ð
⬠â¬
o
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for December's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-12/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of th
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 164 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Truncate jsondiff differences at 512 bytes lest they consume the entire
page.
* Wrap our external call to cmp(1) with a profile (to match
this article? I'd love to read it.
Thanks for your interest. No news since I last posted; we are still
waiting on the initial review. Will be in touch when I know more.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
calling the external stat command.
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Collapse --acl and --xattr into --extended-filesystem-attributes to cover
all of these extended attributes, defaulting the new option to false (ie.
to not check these very expensive external calls).
[ Mattia Rizzolo ]
* Override
552 may also be useful but, again, this is
not quite my area.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
effective.
Could you suggest an alternative wording for that section in the
report? Unfortunately, I don't think I can copy-paste the text you
sent, as it is just slightly too technical as it stands.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
ked here, the additional information regarding its compatibility with
the official app should likely be included.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
(*) It is on my TODO of this week or thereabouts to push it to some
public repo (although that is a slightly tangential topic to the
Outreachy question).
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-01/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 166 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* New features and bugfixes:
- Explicitly remove our top-level temporary directory.
(Closes: #981123, reproducible-builds/diffoscope#234
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬠⬠Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org ð
⬠â¬
o
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your email. The implications of not being able to replicate
results such as these in a legal context are, of course, extremely
disturbing.
(No doubt you can provide more historical background, but this appears
to be another instance where the infallibility of novel
g. to file an issue)
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 174 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Check that we are parsing an actual Debian .buildinfo file, not just
a file with that extension.
(Closes: #987994, reproducible-builds
urrently do not have access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-04/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
ed you there.)
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
ight benefit other distributions
> as well.
I hadn't seen this myself (I don't tend to track Ruby stuff generally),
so thank you for passing it on. :)
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for May's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published; many thanks to all who contributed.
Please share the following URL:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2021-05/
Alternatively, if you are into that kind of thing, ple
roducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬠⬠Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org ð
⬠â¬
o
bute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
d/
Thanks. :)
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
as posted in July, but I've
added it nonetheless and will publish shortly. Thanks for the helpful
pointer...
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
form to compare them. It can compare two tarballs, ISO images, or PDF
just as easily.
Version 173 includes the following changes:
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Add support for showing annotations in PDF files.
(Closes: reproducible-builds/diffoscope#249)
* Move to assert_diff in test_pdf.py
Chris Lamb wrote:
> > I reviewed the latter and found some issues:
>
> Thanks for your review. Unfortunately, there is limited scope to
> make substantive changes at this stage in the publication cycle.
>
> However, I'm sure some of the grammatical fixes you mention can be
single file, it's likely to change
significantly and its value to others is as-yet untested, I was
thinking of simply putting it with the other scripts in
reproducible-utils.git to start with.
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
hard/technical
detail less of a problem when considered in context.
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
le-builds/diffoscope
- Issues and feature requests
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues
- Contribution instructions (eg. to file an issue)
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o rep
101 - 200 of 447 matches
Mail list logo
