Re: [RBASE-L] - Pagelock (corrected text)

2017-05-30 Thread karentellef via RBASE-L
s would be that 90% of the app updates multiple rows, so probably no reason to change from the default On. Karen -Original Message- From: Dan Goldberg <d...@lancecamper.com> To: rbase-l <rbase-l@googlegroups.com> Sent: Tue, May 30, 2017 5:25 pm Subject: RE: [RBA

RE: [RBASE-L] - Pagelock (corrected text)

2017-05-30 Thread Dan Goldberg
To: rbase-l@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [RBASE-L] - Pagelock (corrected text) Ooops, got one word wrong I'm wrestling with the decision of whether to use PAGELOCK OFF in one of my bigger X Enterprise databases. Looking at all the "help" documents it seems like the only reason you

Re: [RBASE-L] - Pagelock (corrected text)

2017-05-30 Thread karentellef via RBASE-L
Ooops, got one word wrong I'm wrestling with the decision of whether to use PAGELOCK OFF in one of my bigger X Enterprise databases. Looking at all the "help" documents it seems like the only reason you would want pagelock On (the default) is if you are updating all the rows in a