Yes! Hit the nail on the head. That's all I need to see on this topic.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 10, 2012, at 2:19 PM, soapscum smula...@gmail.com wrote:
His criticism of the book is based on a lack of attention to details of those
things the book is specifically NOT about. Brilliant. It's
Hey All,
Just for the sake of clarity, I am the OP and the only other post on this
particular subject/thread from me was the very first one in which I shared
the review of JR that 'george the cyclist' had written. So, not only did I
not make mention of anything relating to cannabis, the
+1
And for myself, no matter what Grant writes, if I agree or disagree, I
thoroughly enjoy how he writes.
-JimD
On Dec 11, 2012, at 3:59 PM, PATRICK MOORE bertin...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to stay away from this thread, but this post makes me speak.
I haven't read the book, but I've read
Hey All,
Grant his the courage to speak his mind. I like this, but it almost ensures
that any one person will not like everything Grant says. That includes
myself.
The one recurring thing I hear inside my head while reading something from
Grant is that he loves bikes as much as I do. That does
His criticism of the book is based on a lack of attention to details of
those things the book is specifically NOT about. Brilliant. It's like
saying you hated 'Skyfall' because it wasn't a western.
On Monday, December 10, 2012 11:43:13 AM UTC-8, Anne Paulson wrote:
My reaction exactly. He
http://georgethecyclist.blogspot.com/2012/12/grant-petersons-racing-acumen.html
Regards,
Chris
Redding, Ca.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Book has been out for what, 5 months and now a review? End of year sour
grapes edition or something? Pretty nastily written when he has to harp on
for almost a whole paragraph about how long the book was or wasnt. I think
what people like this george person miss is that sarcasm and wit are funny,
George isn't the world's clearest writer. Did he like the book, or dislike the
book? Hard to tell. Clearly he's got an axe to grind, but his criticisms are
pretty unfocused. The most specific criticism is that some racing stats were
inaccurate?
--
You received this message because you are
My reaction exactly. He spent three paragraphs obsessing about some
details about Tour de France trivia that Grant misstated. I'm sure
that diehard TdF fans care about them, but most people don't.
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
thill@gmail.com wrote:
George
It's pretty nitpicky.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery thill@gmail.com
Sent: Dec 10, 2012 9:55 AM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!
George isn't the world's clearest writer. Did he like the book, or dislike
...@gmail.com javascript:
Sent: Dec 10, 2012 9:55 AM
To: rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com javascript:
Subject: [RBW] Another perspective, by George!
George isn't the world's clearest writer. Did he like the book, or
dislike the book? Hard to tell. Clearly he's got an axe to grind, but his
11 matches
Mail list logo
