Even quads! -- very briefly; Mountain Tamer Quad. Too finicky, IME.
On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 2:58 PM Patrick Moore wrote:
> ... , but I've used singles, doubles, and triples on various 26" wheel
> bikes.)
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
If your current cogset is a freewheel it probably has no more than 7 cogs
which limits the number of different gears.
How many gears you need depends on your own preferences: how high a high --
you've said you want a higher one and yes, 70" is pretty low; how low a low
-- with the 24/34 I assume
Another list member recently asked a question "Which Front Derailleur
option is best for a 38/24 front, 11-36 rear". At the time, I commented
that my AR has a 38/24 front, that I often spin out on level ground and can
only coast down hills, and that I have been planning to remove the chain
In a frantic attempt to make the perfectly accessible into something
more complicated, I ask whether the 2X9 gearing below I propose for my
(very Rivish in philosophy if not Rivendellianly lugged) has any
drawbacks compared to the current 3X7 setup.
Current:
(Big Apple wheelset, 29 diameter.)
Got a lotta 33's.
On Thursday, March 29, 2012, Joe Broach wrote:
Looks good to me! I tried something similar for a while with a 34/22.
Front derailer setup was fiddly. There was a fine line between getting
it to shift to the big ring and shifting off to the outside of the
big ring. I ended
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 08:39 -0600, PATRICK MOORE wrote:
In a frantic attempt to make the perfectly accessible into something
more complicated, I ask whether the 2X9 gearing below I propose for my
(very Rivish in philosophy if not Rivendellianly lugged) has any
drawbacks compared to the current
Thanks for the commentary. I like the fact that the 36 will handle
9/10 of the work with the 24 just as an occasional bailout.
Do those of you who use such small rings find that the rings, cogs and
chain wear much more quickly?
Now I need to pick up some cogsets for disassembly and
