[RBW] Re: + 1 more for Stan's and the F Freds

2013-09-09 Thread art
On Sunday, September 8, 2013 1:55:45 PM UTC-7, Patrick Moore wrote: I don't want to make myself a bore on the subject, but the combination is, to my mind, as big a benefit to all rounder -- ie combination dirt/pavement -- cycling as clipless pedals and modern dynamo lighting to the sport

Re: [RBW] Re: + 1 more for Stan's and the F Freds

2013-09-09 Thread Patrick Moore
Art -- I can't speak directly to the 559 size, but I have used both 559 and 622 60 mm Big Apples and found that the 622s seem to float over sand and absorb high amplitude bumps better at a given pressure (30 psi in the 700C feels like -- IIRC -- 25 psi on the 26ers). OTOH, while the sole 622 FF

[RBW] Re: + 1 more for Stan's and the F Freds

2013-09-09 Thread Philip Williamson
Okay, my interest in Furious Freds is piqued. I've been happily riding 622 60mm Big Apples on the Gravel Roadster (very Fargo-ish bike), but lighter, faster, smaller diameter (the rear BA is 2mm from the seat tube) tires sound great. Philip www.biketinker.com On Sunday, September 8, 2013