Re: [RBW] Re: Big-big better than small-small?

2014-10-28 Thread Patrick Moore
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Johan Larsson seven.nau...@gmail.com wrote: Nope, there's no way anyone can feel a difference between the setups you're describing. Well, that's what I don't know and what I wanted to know. I expect there is not, Garth's article notwithstanding, but as for

[RBW] Re: Big-big better than small-small?

2014-10-27 Thread Johan Larsson
That was an interesting article, thanks for sharing it. Johan Larsson, Sweden On Sunday, October 26, 2014 1:30:01 PM UTC+1, Garth wrote: Yes , Patrick :) It's no accident I see so many pro racers riding the big rings up hills as much as they can :.

[RBW] Re: Big-big better than small-small?

2014-10-27 Thread Johan Larsson
On Sunday, October 26, 2014 2:42:29 AM UTC+1, Patrick Moore wrote: /.../ But still, will bigger sprockers feel, or even be, more freely spinning? */.../* Nope, there's no way anyone can feel a difference between the setups you're describing. How a bicycle feels is so very very subjective,

[RBW] Re: Big-big better than small-small?

2014-10-27 Thread John Stowe
Agreed, good article, and much more thorough than me. I failed to account for the reduced force on the chain when it's on bigger rings! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[RBW] Re: Big-big better than small-small?

2014-10-26 Thread Garth
Yes , Patrick :) It's no accident I see so many pro racers riding the big rings up hills as much as they can :. http://cyclingtips.com.au/2010/04/the-big-ring-mechanical-or-psychological-advantage/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners