Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-11 Thread Peter Morgano
I do appreciate the pictures on Rivendells site that shows the calipers, tire and rim all in one shot, makes it a bit clealer and seems a simple system for at least having some baseline. On Jun 11, 2014 1:13 AM, ted ted.ke...@comcast.net wrote: More or less, and whether 2mm out of 32 should be

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-11 Thread Michael Hechmer
This matches my experience. I bought the G.B. Cerf and they grew from 27 to 29 mm after about 1 or 200 miles. The 27 fit my old racing bike, the 29 didn't! I love them on my Ram though. Michael On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:52:09 PM UTC-4, joe b. wrote: Hi Anne, Also keep in mind that

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-11 Thread Ron Mc
Very good point, Deac - I've noticed with Challenge and Vittoria open tubulars, which are rated for wide pressures, they stretch like crazy with a few days a high pressure. On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:01:44 PM UTC-5, Deacon Patrick wrote: Try inflating them to max pressure for a night or a

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-11 Thread Patrick Moore
My Parigi Roubaix measure 30 mm on older Open Pros. On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Michael Hechmer mhech...@gmail.com wrote: This matches my experience. I bought the G.B. Cerf and they grew from 27 to 29 mm after about 1 or 200 miles. The 27 fit my old racing bike, the 29 didn't! I love

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-11 Thread Ron Mc
my Strada Biancas mesure 33mm on Synergy On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 4:50:54 PM UTC-5, Patrick Moore wrote: My Parigi Roubaix measure 30 mm on older Open Pros. On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Michael Hechmer mhec...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: This matches my experience. I bought the

[RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-10 Thread Garth
All Tires measure differently on different rims. Open Pro rims are only 19.5mm wide, whereas the Compass Grand Bois rims , which are likely what is used to measure them, is 23mm. That difference will make the same tire appear to be different widths . Also, how one is measuring the tire

[RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-10 Thread Deacon Patrick
That's about a 6% discrepancy, which certainly seems reasonable given different rim widths and tire stretch. With abandon, Patrick On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 4:52:31 PM UTC-6, Anne Paulson wrote: If you order some of Jan Heine's tires, be aware of a size discrepancy. I just got a couple of

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-10 Thread Anne Paulson
It's 6% in diameter, but that makes 12% difference in volume, which is what we care about. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Deacon Patrick lamontg...@mac.com wrote: That's about a 6% discrepancy, which certainly seems reasonable given different rim widths and tire stretch. With abandon,

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-10 Thread Joe Broach
Hi Anne, Also keep in mind that tires (it SEEMS like especially light, supple ones) grow in width over the first couple hundred miles. Don't be surprised if the GBs relax out to 32 or close after some riding. Best, joe broach portland, or On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Anne Paulson

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-10 Thread Deacon Patrick
Try inflating them to max pressure for a night or a few days and see where there are. With abandon, Patrick On Tuesday, June 10, 2014 6:31:44 PM UTC-6, Anne Paulson wrote: It's 6% in diameter, but that makes 12% difference in volume, which is what we care about. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-10 Thread Anne Paulson
The first few hundred miles is just what these tires will be getting real soon now. I'm off on a 600+ mile sagged trip across California starting Thursday. I expect they'll be everything everyone says about them. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Joe Broach joebro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Anne,

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-10 Thread ted
I would think we care about effective spring rate (cush) and how much additional travel is possible before getting a pinch flat. Aren't those driven by the contact patch size, its derivative, and the height of the tire? How does cross section area (or volume) drive those? Are you sure this is

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-10 Thread Anne Paulson
The effective spring rate is going to depend on volume, isn't it, because the volume says how much air there is and that determines how much compression there can be? And the contact patch is going to depend on diameter, isn't it? The derivative of the contact patch with respect to what? On

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-10 Thread ted
The derivate of contact patch area with respect to drop. I think the support force is roughly psi times contact patch area. I think that though the internal pressure may increase slightly that effect is negligible because the change in tire volume is a tiny fraction of the total. I think the

Re: [RBW] Re: Grand Bois tires, size discrepancy

2014-06-10 Thread Anne Paulson
So you're saying, then, that low-pressure tires compress not because the air pressure inside them changes, but because the tire deforms in response to a force and the air pressure inside it remains more or less the same. You say it behaves like a spring and we should analyze it like a spring. So