Re: [RBW] Re: ISO MTB 1" threadless fork.

Thanks Joe! That's awesome and may be the trick. ~Hugh “Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.” ― Albert Einstein http://velocipeedemusings.com/ On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Joe Bunik wrote: > Hugh, > > How about one of these

Re: [RBW] Re: ISO MTB 1" threadless fork.

Hugh, How about one of these new-run Project 2 forks: http://www.bikeman.com/KON-P2MTNONEINCH.html =- Joe Bunik Walnut Creek, CA On 4/13/16, iamkeith wrote: > This may or may not work: > > http://viciouscycles.com/forks.php3 > > The shortest one offered is 413mm a-c

[RBW] Re: ISO MTB 1" threadless fork.

This may or may not work: http://viciouscycles.com/forks.php3 The shortest one offered is 413mm a-c though, which I think would roughly translate to most 80mm travel forks with 15% sag. The problem, I think, is that in '95, most mountain bikes probably had a 63mm travel fork. The judy could

[RBW] Re: ISO MTB 1" threadless fork.

Thanks Phillip. I totally forgot about these. With the first one I'd still need to use a shim and the second one is there enough depth for a quill to insert enough to be safe? I imagine so since they make it, I'm guessing the quill goes down part way into the 1" threadless steerer. ~Hugh On