[RBW] Re: Paul Touring vs. Neo-retro question

2023-01-23 Thread greenteadrinkers
Thank you all for the feedback, very helpful! Scott On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:09:50 PM UTC-5 rcook...@gmail.com wrote: > I was familiar with the Sheldon page, but not the Zinn piece. Nice to have > an explanation for the old Neo-Retro warning. Thanks for the reference. > > -- > Bob >

[RBW] Re: Paul Touring vs. Neo-retro question

2023-01-21 Thread Bob
I was familiar with the Sheldon page, but not the Zinn piece. Nice to have an explanation for the old Neo-Retro warning. Thanks for the reference. -- Bob On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 12:40:30 PM UTC-7 cjus...@gmail.com wrote: > Bob, > > My understanding is that this is one of the cases

[RBW] Re: Paul Touring vs. Neo-retro question

2023-01-21 Thread J G
Bob, My understanding is that this is one of the cases where the physics of brake design and how they interact with the setup as related to yoke angle in this case, creates confusion because it is not just the brake design that has to be considered, but also the yoke angle's part in overall

[RBW] Re: Paul Touring vs. Neo-retro question

2023-01-21 Thread Bob
Scott, I've used the Neo-Retro as a front brake for about ten years and have always had great luck with it. It looks great and, at the time, I was under the impression that the Neo-Retro was the more powerful brake—than the Touring Canti, that is. Paul's web page for the Neo-Retro used to warn