[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference?

2016-09-29 Thread 'Hudson Doerge' via RBW Owners Bunch
Simpleone is canti as well. Earlier info before it was released suggested it was going to be long reach calipers, but it ended up being built with canti brakes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference?

2016-09-29 Thread JohnS
I'm partial to canti-brakes since I bought my first Stumpjumper back in '82 (I had two more in the '90's), so I'm glad to have a QB. It's a blast to ride! I've started a job near BWI airport and I'm planning to ride the BWI and B trails with it next week. May have to up the chain ring or size

RE: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference?

2016-09-28 Thread Belopsky
Blast for the past but I'm somewhat interested in a simpleone or a quickbeam if anyone has one in 54 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference?

2013-05-31 Thread Matt Beebe
Congratulations on picking up such a neat bike. I'll add to the quotes StatrixBob provided, with the description below which is from the Riv site, and a post here on the ROB by Grant about the differences below that. The HTA on the QB is 72.5 if you go by the geometry chart, and I

RE: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference?

2013-05-31 Thread Allingham II, Thomas J
@googlegroups.com [mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Montclair BobbyB Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:14 PM To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com Subject: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference? I believe my SO was one of the (if not THE) last one(s)... It has

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference?

2013-05-31 Thread Bryan
The sad similarity between the two bikes is that neither are being made anymore. Bryan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

RE: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference?

2013-05-31 Thread Larry Powers
. You will not regret it if you live. - Mark Twain Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 08:51:04 -0700 From: bwedg...@gmail.com To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference? The sad similarity between the two bikes is that neither are being made

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference?

2013-05-30 Thread Michael
I would love to try a Quick or Simple. But I'd need some low gearing like 34t up front. It still wouldn't be low enough for some of the hills around here. I am pretty sure I would get hooked on it. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference?

2013-05-30 Thread Montclair BobbyB
I believe my SO was one of the (if not THE) last one(s)... It has beautiful paint, but no creme headtube (all green). It has canti studs, too. It's PERFECT. Tom Allingham has a QB and SO... What say ye, Tom? On Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:23:47 PM UTC-4, Michael wrote: I would love to try a

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs. Simpleone: What's the difference?

2013-05-30 Thread Tim Whalen
Thanks everybody! Somehow I have ended up with one of each both 58cm, (notice the passive voice - I am sure I had nothing to do with it) and am considering getting rid of one. Or of both and riding my Atlantis single speed which I have done before and enjoyed. Micjhael, I am sure you would get

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-06 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Single Sixty Sidepull Sam -- does this mean what I think it does? Photo? Gear? Your evaluation of it? On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Peter Pesce petepe...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I scratched the itch, but I bought Matt's silver Quickbeam instead of an SO. Can't wait for it to get here!

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-06 Thread Peter Pesce
Patrick- Not sure what you think it means ;-) but it's a 60cm Sam with sidepull brakes and a single top tube. There was a thread a couple of months ago where some of us were trying to decipher all the various versions of Sam that are/were available. I have a few not-so-great flickr photos

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-06 Thread PATRICK MOORE
Single refers to top tube; sorry, I thought it might refer to a single gear. I could see a ss Sam ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3FnpaWQJO0 On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Peter Pesce petepe...@gmail.com wrote: Patrick- Not sure what you think it means ;-) but it's a 60cm Sam with

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-05 Thread Jim Thill - Hiawatha Cyclery
All this talk of buying an $800 single-speed frame for its versatility in being able to be converted to a multi-geared derailleur bike is humorous to me. Everything about such a conversion on that frame would be a suboptimal hack. I think it would make a pretty nice single-speed. -- You

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-05 Thread Philip Williamson
Thanks, Jason. That's the best side-by-side comparison I've seen of the Quickbeam vs the SimpleOne. For my part, the tangible differences are a wash. I prefer the the SO's color and clearance, and my green QB's lighter tubing and lack of doo-dads. I like the QB color, I just like muddier colors

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-05 Thread Jim Mather
Great looking bike! And you're right -- at $800 it's a very good buy. If I didn't have a QB, I'd be getting a SO. jim m wc ca On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:28 PM, jandrews_nyc jasonaschwa...@gmail.comwrote: my boss has a 58 Quickbeam. I have a 58 Simpleone. I've ridden both and feel that I can

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-04 Thread newenglandbike
You could use an old 120mm 5-speed, which can still be found. On Tuesday, January 3, 2012 10:39:40 PM UTC-5, Allan in Portland wrote: IIRC, the rear spacing is 120mm. I suppose one could spring it to 126 to fit an old 5 or 6 speed, but I'm not sure that still qualifies as easily. Regards,

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-04 Thread Scott G.
Phil Wood freewheel hubs can be ordered with 120mm end caps for 5 speed use. You can then buy new end caps to make the hub 130mm, a handy hub for bob bikes. Now is someone could put Suntour freewheels back into production we'd be in business. Eric how do you like the S3X ? I'm looking for a

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-04 Thread Eric Norris
So far, so good with the S3X. I have this hub on two different bikes, and both are working fine. The only issue so far is that the hubs don't like to shift under a load. If you're already grinding up a hill, it's too late to shift (unless you can somehow soft pedal for a moment). Other than

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-04 Thread Peter Pesce
Oh man. All this talk of no-brainers - You guys have my credit card finger starting to itch! Does anyone know if a long reach caliper brake will work in front? I know the frame is designed for cantis but I kind of like the simplicity of a sidepull on a single-speed. I can always use the canti

Re: [RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-04 Thread Jim Mather
I don't know about the brake. On my QB with Open Sport I'm currently running 700x40 Marathon Supremes, but I did run 700x50 Big Apples just fine. Scratch that itch! jim m wc ca On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Peter Pesce petepe...@gmail.com wrote: Oh man. All this talk of no-brainers - You

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-03 Thread charlie
I think the tubing is a tad thicker which for me is good. (.9x.6x.9 as opposed to .8x.5x.8) I love mine, it rides really nice and the paint is understated and woodsy lookingperfect for a bicycle. Only $800 for the frame is a swingin deal. This frame can easily be used with a hub geared wheel

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-03 Thread Allan in Portland
IIRC, the rear spacing is 120mm. I suppose one could spring it to 126 to fit an old 5 or 6 speed, but I'm not sure that still qualifies as easily. Regards, -Allan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To view this discussion on

[RBW] Re: Quickbeam vs SimpleOne

2012-01-03 Thread jandrews_nyc
my boss has a 58 Quickbeam. I have a 58 Simpleone. I've ridden both and feel that I can sort of compare them. I've also worked on his and built mine up so I've seen a lot up close. I think Charlie is right in that the Simpleone has very slightly thicker tubingbut that doesn't really