I currently have a Sam Hillborne and a Joe Appaloosa. I find that
combination ideal perfect for my needs. I picked up a 59 Clem H at the end
of 2019 and built it up as an Analog mountain bike. Spent a ton of money on
premium parts and ended up selling the bike less than a year later. I think
I think the ride quality difference will come down to fit, and style of
setup (i.e. light wheels and supple tires vs. durable wheels and touring
tires), with the primary difference being driven by whichever bike fits you
best.
Unfortunately, the Clems have only 3 sizes, and that will tend to
I don't agree. I've owned both and the MIT Atlantis is perceptably lighter
and zippier. Is it a massive difference? No, I don't think that question
was being asked.
Joe Bernard
On Thursday, July 1, 2021 at 2:58:00 PM UTC-7 Gill wrote:
> Expectancy bias should perhaps be factored into the
Expectancy bias should perhaps be factored into the equation. The Atlantis
is a fancier more expensive bike and that fact can’t help but influence
perceptions. As someone who has had both bikes I would contend that if you
rode them both blindfolded (admittedly a dicey undertaking) you’d be
