[RBW] Re: WTB: Atlantis MIT 59cm or 62cm Frameset

2023-07-08 Thread Luke Hendrickson
Randy – love to hear that! This bike’s been a wonderful dirt road shredder over the last year. Stoked to see how you build yours up. On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 6:02:36 PM UTC-7 larson@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks Luke! Your Atlantis is part of the inspiration for this idea. > Randy in WI >

[RBW] Re: WTB: Atlantis MIT 59cm or 62cm Frameset

2023-07-08 Thread larson....@gmail.com
Thanks Luke! Your Atlantis is part of the inspiration for this idea. Randy in WI On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 5:53:53 PM UTC-5 Luke Hendrickson wrote: > [image: R0004684.jpeg] > > On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 3:53:05 PM UTC-7 Luke Hendrickson wrote: > >> I have the current MIT and I have Conti

[RBW] Re: WTB: Atlantis MIT 59cm or 62cm Frameset

2023-07-08 Thread Luke Hendrickson
I have the current MIT and I have Conti Mountain Kings which are a plump 2.3” On Saturday, July 8, 2023 at 1:26:51 PM UTC-7 larson@gmail.com wrote: > I have the previous version of the Appaloosa, which clearance in reality > is about 700x50. I tried 2.1” WTB Nano on Cliffhanger rims and

[RBW] Re: WTB: Atlantis MIT 59cm or 62cm Frameset

2023-07-08 Thread larson....@gmail.com
I have the previous version of the Appaloosa, which clearance in reality is about 700x50. I tried 2.1” WTB Nano on Cliffhanger rims and wore some paint off the chainstay in moderately muddy conditions. I would like to run a 2.2/2.3” tire with decent clearance-maybe the Atlantis is not the right

[RBW] Re: WTB: Atlantis MIT 59cm or 62cm Frameset

2023-07-08 Thread Ryan
Not to complicate anything, but basis 2023 specs, the MIT Atlantis seems to take the same maximum ~55m tire size. The current spec sheet says the Appaloosa tops out at 60cm; the Atlantis 62cm, so maybe the frame size of your Appaloosa is the issue?