[RBW] Re: FS: Rosco Platypus - 60cm - $1600

[Paul Donald]

Did you sell this? 

On Saturday, March 2, 2024 at 10:58:22 AM UTC-8 benjamin...@gmail.com wrote:

> Parting ways with my nearly new Rosco Platypus. Located in Chicago. More 
> pictures available upon request.
>
> Deore 11-speed crankset (32t/175mm crankarms)
> Deore 11-speed derailleur
> Deore 11-speed cassette (11-42)
> Deore 11-speed chain
> Microshift 11-speed thumbie
> Deore v-brakes/levers
> SKS b65 fenders
> Continental 700x50mm tires
> Ergon GC1 grips
> 65cm Rivendell Tosco bars with Nitto 31.8mm quill stem (4-bolt/removable 
> faceplate)
> Alex DM21 rims w/novatec hubs[image: IMG_1489.jpg]
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6bba8a7d-bbf2-4841-982f-7abaf8adc104n%40googlegroups.com.

[RBW] Re: WTB: Bosco and JJJ Bars

[Paul Donald]

I have a set of the VO Granola Bars and a set of the chromo Bosco's at 52 
width. Both in silver. 

Was thinking about keeping the Bosco's for a Riv that I'm in glacial-paced 
negotiations about but i think I might prefer something with a lot less 
rise. Message me if you'd like and we can talk price.

I'm in LA so that might make shipping a little affordable.

On Monday, March 25, 2024 at 12:32:57 PM UTC-7 Collin A wrote:

> Still looking :)
>
> On Wednesday, March 20, 2024 at 9:44:06 PM UTC-7 Collin A wrote:
>
>> Heyo,
>>
>> Looking to do a little cockpit refinement before touring season kicks off 
>> and was hoping to get my hands on some well-loved (but not abused) 
>> handlebars to help me achieve that without breaking the bank. Specifically 
>> I am looking for:
>>
>>1. 52 cm heat treated Bosco bars
>>2. Sycip JJJ or VO Granola bars, either in silver would be ideal
>>
>> If you've got some gathering dust, let me know and lets chat :)
>>
>> Happy Belated Equinox!
>> Collin in Berkeley
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/a7bb4174-3c72-4ebc-844f-80082f9eaeefn%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [RBW] Revisiting the Nitto 52f Basket Rack

[Paul Donald]

I use a steerstopper on my Soma Saga that's fitted with a Crust Clydesdale 
fork. That fork can be loaded up quite heavily, which is what I do with the 
giant basket I have on it. Even with the frame up on a double leg stand the 
fork will still swing if the ground is not level. So I lock the steerer 
with the steerstop which makes loading and unloading much nicer. It has a 1 
1/8th steerer admittedly, but they do have shims for quill stems. And 
whatever you do, don't forget to unhitch the lock before riding off. I've 
done this twice, and learnt my lesson.

On Sunday, March 10, 2024 at 10:07:10 AM UTC-7 weste...@gmail.com wrote:

> Leah, 
>
> Assuming that the issue is wheel flop when parking or loading the bike, 
> consider the Steerstopper. https://steerstopper.com   Not cheap, but 
> works great for its intended purpose. I have one on my Clem with a large 
> front basket (used for commuting and everyday riding) and we have one on 
> our Bilenky touring tandem. 
>
> Julian Westerhout
> Bloomington, IL 
>
> On Sunday, March 10, 2024 at 11:39:30 AM UTC-5 Lucky wrote:
>
>> Aesthetically meh but how about a wheel stabilizer such as:
>> [image: dropped_out_86a3211e-bc6d-4631-8d90-bb7f4587c17e.JPG]
>>
>> Wheel Stabilizer 
>> velo-orange.com 
>> 
>>
>>
>> On Mar 10, 2024, at 09:34, Bicycle Belle Ding Ding!  
>> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> 
>>
>> 
>> Hi Friends,
>>
>> I’ve had a Nitto Basket Rack from Rivendell for a few years. I think it 
>> looks awesome, it’s dead useful, but it annoyed me that it was heavy and 
>> made my bars swing around on my mermaid Platy. But as I plan the build for 
>> my 50 cm purple Platy (which is taking a million years) I am considering 
>> putting the basket rack back into service. It pains me to see it sitting, 
>> and it’s so pretty and unique that I just want to give it another try. 
>> Maybe the 650b wheels will be less floppy with this rack? Maybe the 
>> smaller, lighter bike won’t seem as penalized by the heft of this rack? It 
>> would be such an easy experiment if it wasn’t for the dyno light/wiring 
>> that is affected by the decision. It’s not a matter of simply pulling the 
>> rack, because wire length, light mount, etc are affected and will not be an 
>> easy switch. My shop hates soldering and I certainly can’t do it. 
>>
>> I had started a thread long ago about this and a lot of people reported 
>> similar experiences. Now that some more years have gone by, I’m curious if 
>> opinions have changed, or if more people have these racks and would offer 
>> their opinions. There isn’t much in the way of reviews to read online. 
>> Maybe some here would offer theirs. If more folks are trying and loving 
>> their Nitto Basket Racks, I’ll be likely to install mine. 
>>
>> Meanwhile, this beautiful Platypus sits in my living room on the shelf, 
>> waiting for its parts to return from the anodizer. And, there’s fresh snow 
>> on the ground. But talking bikes will get me through!
>> Leah
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/6d3901b6-9daa-4f24-a810-7ac47b4e0b34n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>> 
>> 
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/ab616903-aa9d-436b-aab5-eea042f95b3en%40googlegroups.com.

[RBW] Re: Going really large on Clems

[Paul Donald]

I wish I could test ride some of these bikes! I am certainly taken by the 
aesthetics of the larger Clems, but my eyes may not be sensible guides for 
actual ride fit. Graham and fiddleharpa (sorry, I can only see your email 
handle here), your pbh's are greater than mine, which is at 85.5, and I set 
my saddle at 74.5mm for 175 cranks. Would you tell me what height your 
saddles are set at, including crank length? Talk me into taking up Justins 
offer of a deal. Or I'll go back to staring at the two size 60 Rosco Bubbe 
Paltypus's I see out there...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/4d776310-8f20-448e-a4ec-12f8fe5866c7n%40googlegroups.com.

[RBW] Re: Has anyone else tried the new Riv seat?

[Paul Donald]

I sold all but one of my Brooks and Selle Anatomica's (I have a B67 if 
anyone's looking) and have replaced them all with Ergon SF and one 
Rivendell Clem saddle. I always wear regular clothes when riding and the 
Ergon SF is less uncomfortable than all the leather saddles were for me. 
The Riv is wide on the nose but so far is slightly more comfortable than 
the Ergon. I commute about 18-20 mile round trip most days in a fairly 
upright riding position.

On Monday, February 26, 2024 at 3:11:24 PM UTC-8 Mackenzy Albright wrote:

> Bumping this thread! 
>
> I just made an order from Blue Lug and noticed they had them in stock. I 
> decided to give it a try since saddles are always a thing and my brooks are 
> all getting quite old and stretched. Now that the seat has been out for a 
> few months I am curious how ya'll are feeling about it given more saddle 
> time. 
>
> On Thursday, December 7, 2023 at 8:24:54 AM UTC-8 Chris K wrote:
>
>> Chris - I wanna say my Ergon saddle is the SR Allroad Comp. Nice basic 
>> saddle.
>>
>> On Thursday, December 7, 2023 at 7:58:55 AM UTC-7 Steven Seelig wrote:
>>
>>> I replaced a Brooks Flyer Curved on my Xtracycle now Bafang E-bike that 
>>> is about as upright as it gets.  Agree that at first I wasn't sure where 
>>> this part of my sit bone connected to that part of the saddle.  After a few 
>>> more rides, I simply forgot it was on the bike at all.  Given that with 
>>> e-bikes you are constantly shifting the assist and the 9 speed derailleur 
>>> to hit the perfect sweet spot, and I ride in City traffic, perhaps I was 
>>> not as in-tune as i would be on a quiet country road.  I prefer it to the 
>>> Brooks and don't miss the absence of the spring in the least.  
>>>
>>> My experience is likely comparing persimmons to cumquats for someone 
>>> riding unupright on an analog bike.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 5, 2023 at 1:53:12 PM UTC-5 Tom Wyland wrote:
>>>
>>> I have it on my Platy currently. It replaced a Selle Anatomica H2 (at 
>>> least for the winter). The SA was a tad too narrow since I swapped to 
>>> slighly more upright bars. I haven't yet decided if the Riv saddle is too 
>>> wide (by 1-2cm).  I don't really care for the wide nose of the Riv saddle, 
>>> but I suppose I'll get used to it. I do like the flat shape and the amount 
>>> of padding (minimal). It's good for a more upright ride due to the width.  
>>> I may use it on my wife's bike to swap out the Bontrager commuter saddle 
>>> (wide).  When viewed from the side, the Bontrager commuter saddle has 
>>> shoulders that slope down where the Riv saddle is a flat profile. We both 
>>> prefer saddles that have a flat profile.  I've also ridden a VO wide 
>>> touring saddle and the Riv saddle is wider both in the nose and the rear.
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/850aa607-5e69-405d-b11f-83742edea54an%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [RBW] Going really large on Clems

[Paul Donald]

I really appreciate all these great opinions. I *could* ride a 64 judging by 
what I’ve read here, but perhaps it is more prudent to seek out a 59. Of course 
now I have to pay very close attention to the posts about Clem vs Platypus. My 
inclination is toward the extreme, and the Clem fulfills that with wheelbase 
etc. The Platypus is relatively sensible in comparison. But this is about 
bicycles, and bicycles are “inherently” sensible so, surely, anything goes 
right?

 
Paul Donald
snippy.p...@gmail.com
www.paulcdonald.com

> On Feb 26, 2024, at 3:21 PM, Mackenzy Albright  
> wrote:
> 
> I've ridden a 59 clementine and "sized up" 64 clem jr. I would have been 
> equally happy with both in terms of ride and fit. I don't feel reach (TT) is 
> an issue with hillibikes given their headtube angle and design around 
> sweptback bars. I'd be cautious sizing up if you want to run flat bars. 
> Aesthetically the saddle was a bit low in the seattube on the 64 for some 
> peoples tastes - but had no issue with leg rub etc. The main reason I kept 
> the 59 and resold the 64 was: a really tall person (the previous owner with 
> regret) wanted the 64 back if I decided it wasn't for me as well as I found 
> the previous Clementine (59) to have a slightly more traditional handling 
> feel which worked better for it's utiliarian commuter purpose as I often am 
> lugging around weight on a porteur rack for work. For unloaded trails and 
> general rides I would have slightly preferred the new gen 64. Both are 
> incredible riding bikes. I can't imagine my life without a Clem. 
> On Saturday, February 24, 2024 at 1:07:39 PM UTC-8 Johnny Alien wrote:
> My PBH generally puts me in the middle of sizes. Either at the top of one 
> range or bottom of the net. For a step thru/general use bike I would go with 
> the size up and for a road setup or diamond frame model I would size down. 
> That has always worked for me. I understand that Rivendell will sometimes 
> suggest massively sizing up on step thru frames but I have never been 
> comfortable that way and also just don't like the look of a slammed stem and 
> seatpost.
> 
> On Saturday, February 24, 2024 at 3:41:09 PM UTC-5 rmro...@gmail.com wrote:
> Yes! 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Feb 24, 2024, at 2:38 PM, Patrick Moore  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Isn't Grant's intention with these very long reaches to the bar, to allow 
>> bars with long sweepback on a stem of reasonable length and with a lot of 
>> rise?
>> 
>> In my own case, with short arms and long torso and a drop bar level with or 
>> below saddle, I need a very undersquare frame (60 X 56 c-c is perfect) for a 
>> level top tube; of courses, if I were to use a non-drop bar with a lot of 
>> sweepback, things could be different.
>> 
>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 11:23 AM Josh C  wrote:
>> I could fit on anything between 59-64cm with the low top tube but I'd pick 
>> the 59 just to keep the overall length down. These bikes are already crazy 
>> long, I don't want to make it longer unnecessarily, a 64 clem is like riding 
>> an 80s Lincoln Towncar. I don't understand the draw of sizing up. 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/CALuTfgu5jTaTQ1JhcrX4-ncWw9Zdk-xqiz6fSWhUoYFWtogH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rbw-owners-bunch/qKgvFZlCf5A/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/da715ea9-1bf9-4a3e-a5f6-9c15ae4957f9n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/714D7743-E6BA-4099-8E61-875706D65053%40gmail.com.

[RBW] Going really large on Clems

[Paul Donald]

Hi, I'm new here, all my Rivendell ownership is currently confined to their 
components all over my Riv-esque bikes, Soma Saga, New Albion Privateer, 
Schwinn High Sierra (that one is destined to be replaced with a proper Riv) 
Omnium Cargo. It would be nice to have the main course and not just be 
fiddling with the condiments.

I've been reading what folks have written about Riv sizing, both here and 
on Rivs website, and was particularly interested in Grant's experiment with 
a 64 Clem for his 85mm PBH. I have a PBH of 85.5 so in theory I could do 
similar. Oddly, according to their spec sheets, a 64 has 1mm less reach 
than a 59.

Anyone cheerfully riding against the grain size-wise?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c2348c56-457f-44c9-8058-02898b8cf5fan%40googlegroups.com.