I think that for people who think TCO is an issue -- it is, and I don't try
to change their minds. But I think if someone is wondering whether it's
going to be an issue for them... it probably isn't.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Horace max...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
I think that for people who think TCO is an issue -- it is, and I don't try
to change their minds. But I think if someone is wondering whether it's
going to be an issue for them... it probably isn't.
TCO was an issue,
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Seth Vidal skvi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Horace max...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote:
I think that for people who think TCO is an issue -- it is, and I don't
try
to change their minds. But I think if someone is wondering whether it's
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:22 PM, james black chocot...@gmail.com wrote:
Bicycles should not cause this kind
of low-grade anxiety. It's unnecessary - if a bike has TCO, the wheels
are too big. Design it out with smaller wheels!
Oh, c'mon. TCO tolerance is as personal as saddle likes and pedal
Seems to be a problem because it has a name/acronym. All it means is that at
speeds less than about 6mph, if you turn the wheel enough and time it just
wrong with your pedal stroke, your shoe hits the fender or tire. It's one of
those things that sounds worse than it is. It cannot happen at faster
