Re: [RBW] Big-big better than small-small?

2014-10-26 Thread Patrick Moore
John and Garth: thanks; both responses contain food for thought. My thought, upon pursuing the matter, is that heavier circumferences (ie, rims and tires) with larger radiuses, maintain momentum better, and this is what I feel; the differences in friction between a 52/17 and a 46/15, per the

[RBW] Big-big better than small-small?

2014-10-25 Thread Patrick Moore
On my Ram, the 70 cruising gear (#5 out of 9) is a 52 X 20, and despite the relative heft of the Ram, the bike just seems to want to go. On my '99 Joe gofast 26 fixie custom, the 75 gear is composed of a 46 t ring and a 15 t cog driving a 24.5 wheel. The Gofast doesn't exhibit that ineluctible

[RBW] Big-big better than small-small?

2014-10-25 Thread John Stowe
Are you sure the different feel isn't attributable to the 70 vs 75 difference? Does the Ram have a gear combo you could test that's closer to 75? Are the geometry, rider position, etc. similar enough that it's a fair test? Pondering in the abstract, though, I'd expect real world differences to