Classic Blackburn-style low riders have done well on my Romulus for several
tours. I just used p clamps. It will discolor the paint over time. Fork and
tubing are functionally equivalent to your 'bou. Go for it!
-joe in pdx
Caveat lector. Sent from a phone.
On Dec 28, 2016 1:24 PM, "Kieran J"
I would have no hesitation whatsoever to trying a good lowrider on a
Rambouillet. My personal favorite it the Nitto F27, but many people think that
is too much money to spend on a rack. I think it's a bargain at the going
price.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
I never used front low riders on my Ram (one of the later ones, FWIW), but
I did have them built and installed on my 2003 custom, and the bike handles
10 per side very well, and I've carried 20 per side, which made the
steering sluggish.
As Steve said, there's a huge difference between carrying a
I've got front lowriders on my Quickbeam and it rides great with a balanced
load.
-Kai
Brooklyn NY
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On 12/29/2016 06:10 AM, Bruce Herbitter wrote:
The Ram fork is 1.0 non butted. RBW sold the bike as a "light" tour
capable bike, not intended as a front loader.
Ah, but you do not need a "front loader" to use lowriders. They work
fine with all geometries, basically.
The Saluki which
The Ram fork is 1.0 non butted. RBW sold the bike as a "light" tour
capable bike, not intended as a front loader. The Saluki which is the same
bike as the Hilsen today was the one sold as a medium tourer with front and
rear pannier rack mounts, while Atlantis was the heavy tourer. A slot now
I will add that the most extreme (and yet possibly most logical) option would
be to commission a new low-ish trail fork from Tom Matchak or another builder,
and powder the whole shootin' match.
I'm wanting to reserve that as a last and most sensible/costly resort.
KJ
--
You received this
On 12/28/2016 08:15 PM, Bruce Herbitter wrote:
the fork is not intended for the weight either in the tubing choice or
the geometry. But you are correct, top rack and low hung weight will
be different.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Steve Palincsar
the fork is not intended for the weight either in the tubing choice or the
geometry. But you are correct, top rack and low hung weight will be
different.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Steve Palincsar wrote:
> Yes, but a lowrider isn't like Marks rack.
>
>
> On 12/28/2016
Yes, but a lowrider isn't like Marks rack.
On 12/28/2016 07:37 PM, Fullylugged wrote:
The bike wasn't designed as a front loader, which is why the absence of mounts.
I used a Marks rack on mine which attaches with P-Clamps and didn't like te
handling with anything over about 5 lbs in it.
The bike wasn't designed as a front loader, which is why the absence of mounts.
I used a Marks rack on mine which attaches with P-Clamps and didn't like te
handling with anything over about 5 lbs in it. YMMV.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW
Hi All,
Hope everyone is having a nice holiday season!
I'm curious about how the Rambouillet handles with different configs of a
front load. I've only ever really used a small Swift Bandito up on the
handlebar, but never anything more substantial.
Have any Ram owners ever:
- somehow run
12 matches
Mail list logo