Re: [RBW] Impressed by an AHH (though I don't own one)

2012-07-11 Thread Bruce Herbitter
Riv refers to the AHH as a Country Bike. Intended for dirt fire roads as
well as smooth pavement. Lighter loads as you say. You can read Riv's
comparison of the two models on Cyclofiend at the link below: (The article
refers to Saluki, which is the same bike in smaller sizes as AHH)

http://www.cyclofiend.com/Images/rbw/rr37_pg14.jpg

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Joe Bernard joerem...@gmail.com wrote:

 The Bleriot and SH were/are built with thicker tubes than the AHH,
 correct? My AHH felt very springy/lively, just like my Romulus did. I would
 say both are more road-only lighter-load biased than the Bleriot and
 Hillborne.

 Joe Bernard
 Vallejo, CA.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Impressed by an AHH (though I don't own one)

2012-07-11 Thread blueride2
From the Rivendell website;

The Sam Hillborne is the replacement for the* Bleriot,* with some 
differences. It's a cross between the Atlantis, our cantilever-braked 
touring bike, and the A. Homer HIlsen, our roadish country bike. It's a 
cross... means it has tubing halfway in between the two (in *wall 
thickness.*..) and the 40mm max tire clearance (and straight chainstays) of 
the A.Homer Hilsen.  

I imagine the AHH has slightly heavier tubing than the Roadeo, but thinner 
tubing than the Atlantis and the Sams.



On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 7:10:25 PM UTC-4, Joe Bernard wrote:

 The Bleriot and SH were/are built with thicker tubes than the AHH, 
 correct? My AHH felt very springy/lively, just like my Romulus did. I would 
 say both are more road-only lighter-load biased than the Bleriot and 
 Hillborne. 
  
 Joe Bernard
 Vallejo, CA.

 On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 3:10:16 PM UTC-7, James Warren wrote:


 I've had the same experience in comparing a SH to an AHH: same fit, 
 similar toptube, both set up with similar 36-spoke wheels, Brooks saddles, 
 and typical Nitto Aluminum bits.  Both with Jack Brown greens. The big 
 difference in the frames was 60 cm SH with 6 degree toptube slope versus a 
 65 cm AHH with a 1.5 degree toptube slope, but the bar height relative to 
 saddle was the same. AHH's chainstay was 0.5 cm shorter! There's faerie 
 dust on those AHH's!

 - Jim


 On Jul 10, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Joan Oppel wrote:

  I led a group ride this morning for one of the local bike clubs. 
  Richard showed up with his brand new A Homer Hilsen.  He's very excited 
 about the bike, has posted here about his excitement (blueride2).  It's a 
 pretty standard Riv build.  I took my Bleriot to the ride - another 
 standard Riv build.  
 Differences are: 
 Bleriot has Hetres (45 front, 50 rear),  AHH has Jack Browns (at 70 front 
 and rear)
 Bleriot has SKS fenders, AHH is fenderless (though he is waiting for the 
 fenders).
 Bleriot is a 53, AHH is a 55.
 Bleriot has a trunk bag and rack(multi-tool, spare, patch kit) and rack, 
 AHH had just a tiny seatbag.

 Since I can ride a 55, I took Richard's bike for a short spin.  Wow, was 
 I impressed.  It felt - sprightly, lively.  Definitely different than the 
 Bleriot.  

 I'm wondering why.  There's maybe a slight difference in weight between 
 the two bikes, by feel.  Is it the tires?  the tubeset?  
 Joan

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


 James Warren
 jimcwar...@earthlink.net

 - Remember, my friends, it is better to feel fast than to be fast.


  


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/W_77gA3IquoJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Impressed by an AHH (though I don't own one)

2012-07-11 Thread Cyclofiend
I don't think it's as simple as thick vs thin tubes.  When the  
Hillborne first arrived, I was lucky enough to ride one over at the  
RBWHQL , as well as hear what Grant had come up with in terms of  
design and tube set choice.   It is definitely a different selection  
of tubes - as one would expect from a different frame design.


At the time I rode it, the ride seemed to land just where GP had said  
- between the Atlantis and the Hilsen (for some reason, light-framed  
Atlantis came to mind, even though I don't own an Atlantis for true  
comparison).   I never really heard what choices were made with the  
Bleriot, but it was modeled after the Saluki.  It would not surprise  
me that some allowances were made to keep the price down and work with  
the production facility (Maxway) and the needs of QBP, who was the  
partner in the project.


And tires and pressures make a HUGE difference in any test ride.   
The first time I rode a Hilsen, it was actually fitted with Rolly  
Polly 28's (at the time the JB's had not yet arrived).  Grant sent me  
off on the bike saying very specifically that the tires were not what  
the bike was designed for.  It felt akin to my open-wheeled racer. 
When I rode it again before buying one, with the JB's, it felt like a  
Lamborghini with a Land Rover undercarriage.


- J

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Impressed by an AHH (though I don't own one)

2012-07-11 Thread Eric Platt
Agree with this assessment.  Have an early Hillborne and used to own an
Atlantis.  The ride does seem to be similar.  Closer than, say, my
Simpleone to the Atlantis.

Then again maybe my memory is all wrong as I haven't owned the Atlantis for
a few years.

Eric Platt
St. Paul, MN
On Jul 11, 2012 10:54 AM, Cyclofiend cyclofi...@earthlink.net wrote:

 I don't think it's as simple as thick vs thin tubes.  When the
 Hillborne first arrived, I was lucky enough to ride one over at the RBWHQL
 , as well as hear what Grant had come up with in terms of design and tube
 set choice.   It is definitely a different selection of tubes - as one
 would expect from a different frame design.

 At the time I rode it, the ride seemed to land just where GP had said -
 between the Atlantis and the Hilsen (for some reason, light-framed
 Atlantis came to mind, even though I don't own an Atlantis for true
 comparison).   I never really heard what choices were made with the
 Bleriot, but it was modeled after the Saluki.  It would not surprise me
 that some allowances were made to keep the price down and work with the
 production facility (Maxway) and the needs of QBP, who was the partner in
 the project.

 And tires and pressures make a HUGE difference in any test ride.  The
 first time I rode a Hilsen, it was actually fitted with Rolly Polly 28's
 (at the time the JB's had not yet arrived).  Grant sent me off on the bike
 saying very specifically that the tires were not what the bike was designed
 for.  It felt akin to my open-wheeled racer.When I rode it again before
 buying one, with the JB's, it felt like a Lamborghini with a Land Rover
 undercarriage.

 - J

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.**comrbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
 .
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
 group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=enhttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
 .



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Impressed by an AHH (though I don't own one)

2012-07-10 Thread Joan Oppel
I led a group ride this morning for one of the local bike clubs. Richard showed up with his brand new A Homer Hilsen. He's very excited about the bike, has posted here about his excitement (blueride2). It's a pretty standard Riv build. I took my Bleriot to the ride - another standard Riv build. Differences are:Bleriot has Hetres (45 front, 50 rear), AHH has Jack Browns (at 70 front and rear)Bleriot has SKS fenders, AHH is fenderless (though he is waiting for the fenders).Bleriot is a 53, AHH is a 55.Bleriot has a trunk bag and rack(multi-tool, spare, patch kit) and rack, AHH had just a tiny seatbag.Since I can ride a 55, I took Richard's bike for a short spin. Wow, was I impressed. It felt - sprightly, lively. Definitely different than the Bleriot. I'm wondering why. There's maybe a slight difference in weight between the two bikes, by feel. Is it the tires? the tubeset? Joan



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




Re: [RBW] Impressed by an AHH (though I don't own one)

2012-07-10 Thread James Warren

I've had the same experience in comparing a SH to an AHH: same fit, similar 
toptube, both set up with similar 36-spoke wheels, Brooks saddles, and typical 
Nitto Aluminum bits.  Both with Jack Brown greens. The big difference in the 
frames was 60 cm SH with 6 degree toptube slope versus a 65 cm AHH with a 1.5 
degree toptube slope, but the bar height relative to saddle was the same. AHH's 
chainstay was 0.5 cm shorter! There's faerie dust on those AHH's!

- Jim


On Jul 10, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Joan Oppel wrote:

  I led a group ride this morning for one of the local bike clubs.  Richard 
 showed up with his brand new A Homer Hilsen.  He's very excited about the 
 bike, has posted here about his excitement (blueride2).  It's a pretty 
 standard Riv build.  I took my Bleriot to the ride - another standard Riv 
 build.  
 Differences are: 
 Bleriot has Hetres (45 front, 50 rear),  AHH has Jack Browns (at 70 front and 
 rear)
 Bleriot has SKS fenders, AHH is fenderless (though he is waiting for the 
 fenders).
 Bleriot is a 53, AHH is a 55.
 Bleriot has a trunk bag and rack(multi-tool, spare, patch kit) and rack, AHH 
 had just a tiny seatbag.
 
 Since I can ride a 55, I took Richard's bike for a short spin.  Wow, was I 
 impressed.  It felt - sprightly, lively.  Definitely different than the 
 Bleriot.  
 
 I'm wondering why.  There's maybe a slight difference in weight between the 
 two bikes, by feel.  Is it the tires?  the tubeset?  
 Joan
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

James Warren
jimcwar...@earthlink.net

- Remember, my friends, it is better to feel fast than to be fast.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Impressed by an AHH (though I don't own one)

2012-07-10 Thread Joe Bernard
The Bleriot and SH were/are built with thicker tubes than the AHH, correct? 
My AHH felt very springy/lively, just like my Romulus did. I would say both 
are more road-only lighter-load biased than the Bleriot and Hillborne. 
 
Joe Bernard
Vallejo, CA.

On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 3:10:16 PM UTC-7, James Warren wrote:


 I've had the same experience in comparing a SH to an AHH: same fit, 
 similar toptube, both set up with similar 36-spoke wheels, Brooks saddles, 
 and typical Nitto Aluminum bits.  Both with Jack Brown greens. The big 
 difference in the frames was 60 cm SH with 6 degree toptube slope versus a 
 65 cm AHH with a 1.5 degree toptube slope, but the bar height relative to 
 saddle was the same. AHH's chainstay was 0.5 cm shorter! There's faerie 
 dust on those AHH's!

 - Jim


 On Jul 10, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Joan Oppel wrote:

  I led a group ride this morning for one of the local bike clubs.  Richard 
 showed up with his brand new A Homer Hilsen.  He's very excited about the 
 bike, has posted here about his excitement (blueride2).  It's a pretty 
 standard Riv build.  I took my Bleriot to the ride - another standard Riv 
 build.  
 Differences are: 
 Bleriot has Hetres (45 front, 50 rear),  AHH has Jack Browns (at 70 front 
 and rear)
 Bleriot has SKS fenders, AHH is fenderless (though he is waiting for the 
 fenders).
 Bleriot is a 53, AHH is a 55.
 Bleriot has a trunk bag and rack(multi-tool, spare, patch kit) and rack, 
 AHH had just a tiny seatbag.

 Since I can ride a 55, I took Richard's bike for a short spin.  Wow, was I 
 impressed.  It felt - sprightly, lively.  Definitely different than the 
 Bleriot.  

 I'm wondering why.  There's maybe a slight difference in weight between 
 the two bikes, by feel.  Is it the tires?  the tubeset?  
 Joan

 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at 
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


 James Warren
 jimcwar...@earthlink.net

 - Remember, my friends, it is better to feel fast than to be fast.


  


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/cbMvLcIMjXQJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.