[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
If you have an upright that feels wrong, S84 seatpost will probably make it right. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Or one has a long torso and short legs. I am 6 feet tall and have a 83 PBH (legs from somebody who is 5'9", torso from somebody who is 6'3") and I am fat. On some bikes, even Rivendells with top tubes on the long side, sometimes I just need that little bit extra. Almost all of my saddles are Brooks, and they tend to have less adjustment range than most. Decades ago, I usually rode a frame that was "too large" for me with a really long stem - I have a 140 mm Cinelli stem on one of my bikes. I now have a couple of Nitto lugged seatposts - more comfortable than a long stem and less flex in the steering. Now that VO has ruined their two-bolt setback seatpost - Nitto is the only way to go. Laing On Saturday, September 16, 2017 at 5:49:05 AM UTC-7, Garth wrote: > Well yes, moving the saddle back just to get more reach means either the > bike doesn't fit properly and/or the bars/stem needs changing in some way. > There is a "sweet spot" for every bike and every rider, and there is no set > formula to find it and it's never the same for anyone else. I cannot even > tell you exactly what "it" is, only that it is, you just know it when it's > felt and it's yours to behold and share with that irrestible grin of a > child on your face ☺ > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Garthwrote: > Well yes, moving the saddle back just to get more reach means either the > bike doesn't fit properly and/or the bars/stem needs changing in some way. +1 > There is a "sweet spot" for every bike and every rider, and there is no > set formula to find it and it's never the same for anyone else. I cannot > even tell you exactly what "it" is, only that it is, you just know it when > it's felt and it's yours to behold and share with that irrestible grin of a > child on your face ☺ > Well, but you can start with Peter Jon White's instructions on saddle positioning, in his bike fitting article which I read 20 years ago and which has been the most helpful advice on saddles that I've read. That and 10 years of riding the bike will probably give you a pretty good idea of where the saddle ought to be. (For the excessively earnest, I'm *kidding* about the "10 years" but it will take a while.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Well yes, moving the saddle back just to get more reach means either the bike doesn't fit properly and/or the bars/stem needs changing in some way. There is a "sweet spot" for every bike and every rider, and there is no set formula to find it and it's never the same for anyone else. I cannot even tell you exactly what "it" is, only that it is, you just know it when it's felt and it's yours to behold and share with that irrestible grin of a child on your face ☺ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Well, it's gone now, Bill. I was just emphasizing its purity by leaving it untouched. Jay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Pray tell, Jay, why are you hiding the beauty of that stem behind the light reflecting bag? How about photos of the stem in raw, stark raving nakedness! Cheers, Bill i nRoswell, GA On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:18:31 PM UTC-4, Jay Connolly wrote: > > I have a never-opened Nitto S84 lugged seatpost, 27.2 x 300mm long. $140 > USD, shipped. > > Jay > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
I seem to have the same issue with my Cheviot. I have some Albatross bars I'd like to use but a bar end shifter is stuck is one side and nothing I've tried so far will budge it. I may trim the bars a bit and see if that helps. On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 2:26:35 PM UTC-4, Ryan Fleming wrote: > Hi Tim...you make a good point about not shoving the saddle back and my > other Rivs are not in the least twitchy but this one with Chocos , to my > mind, is and this is after Mark tweaked it by swapping in a longer stem (12 > or 13cm) and cutting off 14mm off the choc. bars. Riv graciously gave me > my choice of what I wanted to do. so I went with that option. One way or > the other, I'm still a few millimeters from Nirvana but I'm also thinking > that the configuration is just not what I'm personally used to. I haven't > ridden an upright bike since I was 13 or 14. Totally fixable , though, I am > sure > > BTW not using this forum to criticize Rivendell who could not have been > more accommodating and who built me a gorgeous bike. > > On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 12:31:35 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: >> >> Maybe this is a dumb suggestion, but couldn't one simulate cutting off >> the Choco bars by gripping them a bit further forward from the ends. I say >> this because I'm guessing that the "twitchiness" you both describe (a >> description I've never heard about any Riv) maybe is due to the increased >> leverage from gripping the very swept back Choco bars at the end (the >> natural place one would grab, of course.) It seems the swept back bars are, >> in essence, a lever, and the further away from the axis of rotation, the >> easier (twitchier?) it is to turn the wheels. If you notice less response >> when you move your hands in, then shorten the bars. I'm thinking that by >> moving the seat back, more weight goes to the rear wheel, thus the >> twitchiness could get worse. Full disclosure: I am about as far from an >> engineer or bike designer as I could be. In other words, my opinion and 4 >> bucks will get you a latte, and nothing else. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Hi Tim...you make a good point about not shoving the saddle back and my other Rivs are not in the least twitchy but this one with Chocos , to my mind, is and this is after Mark tweaked it by swapping in a longer stem (12 or 13cm) and cutting off 14mm off the choc. bars. Riv graciously gave me my choice of what I wanted to do. so I went with that option. One way or the other, I'm still a few millimeters from Nirvana but I'm also thinking that the configuration is just not what I'm personally used to. I haven't ridden an upright bike since I was 13 or 14. Totally fixable , though, I am sure BTW not using this forum to criticize Rivendell who could not have been more accommodating and who built me a gorgeous bike. On Monday, September 11, 2017 at 12:31:35 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote: > > Maybe this is a dumb suggestion, but couldn't one simulate cutting off the > Choco bars by gripping them a bit further forward from the ends. I say this > because I'm guessing that the "twitchiness" you both describe (a > description I've never heard about any Riv) maybe is due to the increased > leverage from gripping the very swept back Choco bars at the end (the > natural place one would grab, of course.) It seems the swept back bars are, > in essence, a lever, and the further away from the axis of rotation, the > easier (twitchier?) it is to turn the wheels. If you notice less response > when you move your hands in, then shorten the bars. I'm thinking that by > moving the seat back, more weight goes to the rear wheel, thus the > twitchiness could get worse. Full disclosure: I am about as far from an > engineer or bike designer as I could be. In other words, my opinion and 4 > bucks will get you a latte, and nothing else. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Seatpost sold. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Maybe this is a dumb suggestion, but couldn't one simulate cutting off the Choco bars by gripping them a bit further forward from the ends. I say this because I'm guessing that the "twitchiness" you both describe (a description I've never heard about any Riv) maybe is due to the increased leverage from gripping the very swept back Choco bars at the end (the natural place one would grab, of course.) It seems the swept back bars are, in essence, a lever, and the further away from the axis of rotation, the easier (twitchier?) it is to turn the wheels. If you notice less response when you move your hands in, then shorten the bars. I'm thinking that by moving the seat back, more weight goes to the rear wheel, thus the twitchiness could get worse. Full disclosure: I am about as far from an engineer or bike designer as I could be. In other words, my opinion and 4 bucks will get you a latte, and nothing else. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Lowering the price on this significantly to move it -- 115 USD (net to me), shipped. Jay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
I just did a ride with another half-inch cut off the Boscos and it was much better: more room and less twitchy. Aside from needing more reach, I think I needed to be a little more over the front end..the wheel had a disconnected 'too far in front of me' feel I didn't like. I'm not trying to talk you out of buying the lugged seatpost, but if you want to get to a hardware store and pick up a pipe cutter you can try taking another inch off your Chocos. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
and part of my problem I guess is that I am so used to moustache bars (which was my original idea) and I still ride drop bars . I was thinking of the seatpost setback as another way to angle my torso more toward what I'm accustomed to...and with more towards the 45 or so degrees I'm used to, I'll have my butt back a little and more weight on the bars. Maybe totally unscientific but I thought I'd explore that to get rid of the twitchiness that I notice...as I say that's where living close to RBWHQ would be a benefit :) aside from the nice folks in California. On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 3:00:29 PM UTC-5, Joe Bernard wrote: > > Ryan, you may benefit from an Albatross if cutting another inch off the > Choco isn't something you want to mess with. I've done major chopping on > the Bosco on my Clem L and still could use a little more room, which the > Alba would give me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Ryan, you may benefit from an Albatross if cutting another inch off the Choco isn't something you want to mess with. I've done major chopping on the Bosco on my Clem L and still could use a little more room, which the Alba would give me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Thanks...that is good to know On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 1:52:22 PM UTC-5, Shoji Takahashi wrote: > > Hi Ryan, > Yes, Nitto lugged seatpost has more setback than Nitto S83 which is ~ same > as Nitto Crystal Fellow. According to Riv website, it's ~40mm compared to > ~20mm compared to ~18mm, respectively. > > Good luck! > shoji > > > > On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:42:24 PM UTC-4, Ryan Fleming wrote: >> >> I wonder if these lugged seatposts have more setback than the S-83 ones >> do. Anybody know? Reason I ask is I wonder if my mixte position would >> benefit from scootching the saddle back a little . >> >> I'm using a Brooks Select on an S-83 and I'm finding that the Choco-Norms >> (which were chopped a bit by Riv) reach back more that I'd like and I find >> the handling a little twitchier than I'd like >> >> On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 1:18:31 PM UTC-5, Jay Connolly wrote: >>> >>> I have a never-opened Nitto S84 lugged seatpost, 27.2 x 300mm long. $140 >>> USD, shipped. >>> >>> Jay >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
Hi Ryan, Yes, Nitto lugged seatpost has more setback than Nitto S83 which is ~ same as Nitto Crystal Fellow. According to Riv website, it's ~40mm compared to ~20mm compared to ~18mm, respectively. Good luck! shoji On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 2:42:24 PM UTC-4, Ryan Fleming wrote: > > I wonder if these lugged seatposts have more setback than the S-83 ones > do. Anybody know? Reason I ask is I wonder if my mixte position would > benefit from scootching the saddle back a little . > > I'm using a Brooks Select on an S-83 and I'm finding that the Choco-Norms > (which were chopped a bit by Riv) reach back more that I'd like and I find > the handling a little twitchier than I'd like > > On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 1:18:31 PM UTC-5, Jay Connolly wrote: >> >> I have a never-opened Nitto S84 lugged seatpost, 27.2 x 300mm long. $140 >> USD, shipped. >> >> Jay >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[RBW] Re: FS Brand New Lugged S84 Seatpost
I wonder if these lugged seatposts have more setback than the S-83 ones do. Anybody know? Reason I ask is I wonder if my mixte position would benefit from scootching the saddle back a little . I'm using a Brooks Select on an S-83 and I'm finding that the Choco-Norms (which were chopped a bit by Riv) reach back more that I'd like and I find the handling a little twitchier than I'd like On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 1:18:31 PM UTC-5, Jay Connolly wrote: > > I have a never-opened Nitto S84 lugged seatpost, 27.2 x 300mm long. $140 > USD, shipped. > > Jay > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.