Re: [RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-29 Thread nawrock
- Original Message - From: Rocky B rivvyr...@gmail.com To: RBW Owners Bunch rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2010 9:21:30 PM Subject: [RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site! I kinda hope they do go with sidepulls with the SO.  It'll make the QB and SO

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-29 Thread Montclair BobbyB
According to my conversation with RBW, the Bombadil with the diagonal tubes (full length to the dropouts) will carry a slight price increase to offset the tubing and funky lugwork (can't wait to see that). The double TT version of the Bomba is apparently no longer being made (bummer, I really

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-28 Thread EricP
I can see that argument, but a Phil Wood rear hub dishes the wheel quite a bit in back. So not sure a disc wheel is inherently weaker. The Hunqa is too much of a personal issue for me to comment objectively. But my initial impression has not changed. The Simple-One does look nice. Actually

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-28 Thread Garth
I'm mostly interested in the Andel cranks. The logo will likely be removable by grade steel wool(ultrafine). I'm trying to get some of these in a 110/74 , but no one in the USA sells them except maybe Gaerlan Cycles, which sells some similar looking under the Vuelta brand name. Or

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-28 Thread Johnny Alien
I thought the diagonal would look bad to me BUT I actually like it alot. I wish all sizes had it because I ride a size too small to have it. On Aug 28, 8:13 am, Garth garth...@gmail.com wrote: I'm mostly interested in the Andel cranks.  The logo will likely be removable by grade steel

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-28 Thread Mike
I kinda like that they're leaning towards sidepulls (Silvers I imagine) for the SO. I've grown to really like those brakes on my Hilsen, they're just a lot easier to deal with than cantis. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW Owners Bunch group. To

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-28 Thread Aaron Young
Personally I like the look of a straight second top tube more than the diagonal. Also, I agree with James V. that the original Breezer style diagonal would be better (but a bit heavier if that even matters). With the diaga-tube will Riv change the Hunqa-graphics so the second crossbar on the H

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-28 Thread Marty
Riv has built Breezeresque bikes before. (Link follows) Interesting to note that the real Breezer had a downward sloping top tube - toward the head tube that is - and twin diagatubes ala Mixte. (you can see it in the second link. Maybe it's the photo that makes it look like it slopes down?) I

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-28 Thread William
There's a very early Breezer on display at Oakland Airport. On Aug 28, 5:46 pm, Marty mgie...@mac.com wrote: Riv has built Breezeresque bikes before. (Link follows) Interesting to note that the real Breezer had a downward sloping top tube - toward the head tube that is - and twin diagatubes

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-28 Thread Rocky B
I kinda hope they do go with sidepulls with the SO. It'll make the QB and SO more distinguishable from each other. On Aug 28, 9:39 am, Mike mjawn...@gmail.com wrote: I kinda like that they're leaning towards sidepulls (Silvers I imagine) for the SO. I've grown to really like those brakes on my

Re: [RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-28 Thread cyclotourist
From what I know (I think based on BQ???), tieing the laterals into the rear dropout is the correct way to build such a bike. If they go into the seat stays, it's not as strong. On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Joe Bunik jbu...@gmail.com wrote: 'ere you go - springer fork, even!:

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-28 Thread William
That's the one. My photo was on my phone, and not worth sharing. On Aug 28, 9:23 pm, Joe Bunik jbu...@gmail.com wrote: 'ere you go - springer fork, even!:http://www.flickr.com/photos/66275...@n00/4899070155 On 8/28/10, William tapebu...@gmail.com wrote: There's a very early Breezer on

Re: [RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-27 Thread James Valiensi
That diagonal - I wish he did it like the original Breezer's. That would be cool. On Aug 27, 2010, at 8:00 PM, doug peterson wrote: Interesting, yes; but also weird looking (the Hunqa). This diagonal thing strikes me as a solution in search of a problem. My Atlantis has been thoroughly

Re: [RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-27 Thread cyclotourist
I'm intrigued. For those of you following along at home, I bought a Karate Monkey on the cheap, but might be persuaded to trade it in to get a Hunq. I'm between sizes, and both 54 58 have compromises for me. Leaning toward a 54 if I can get the bars up high enough to run drops. On Fri, Aug 27,

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-27 Thread Ian Dickson
I'm 5'11, I ordered a 54 Hunq, and I'm going to put drops on it. Once I have it, I'll post pictures and take measurements if you like. On Aug 28, 10:43 am, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote: I'm intrigued.  For those of you following along at home, I bought a Karate Monkey on the cheap,

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-27 Thread Michael_S
I like the Diagonal tube... but the 54 is the best fit for me, which has a single top tube.still thinking a disc brake would be a good thing with those big fat tires too. I'm more interested in the Simpleone at this point. I'll have to wait until later next week to see what's under the

[RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-27 Thread rperks
Disc brakes come with good and bad, I have been an advocate, but I think the dishing of the wheels from the left side opens up greater inherent weaknesses. If the canti brakes are not enough, or the flex in the stays is a bit much you can always throw a booster arch on it. It is not like you

Re: [RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-27 Thread cyclotourist
Hey Ian, great to hear you have one in route! I'm 6ft, and thinking the 54 would be best, especially if the TT is a bit longer than originally planned (that was a mentioned change). The 58 gives long enough reach and ability to get the bars up real high, but would have very minimal stand-over

Re: [RBW] Re: Hunqa and SO update on Riv site!

2010-08-27 Thread cyclotourist
Agreed. Nothing wrong with discs, probably even better for loaded descents (heat), but weaker wheels and over-built forks don't intrigue me too much. V-brakes really stop pretty darn good. So do cantis for that matter! :-) On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:04 PM, rperks perks@gmail.com wrote: