[RBW] Re: FS- sugino triple crank

Sold. Thanks all! On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 4:17:33 AM UTC-8, Adam wrote: > Bump. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[RBW] Re: FS- sugino triple crank

Bump. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit

[RBW] Re: FS- sugino triple crank

Just looked again and they’re actually 170 not 172.5. Sorry for the confusion. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

Yes, I wasn't sure what was asked either. But I answered based on thinking he was asking about what "standard" Rivish triple chainring toothcounts are. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

[RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

I'm intrigued that the list of numbers in the original post has generated 8 replies so far (not counting Garth's) that address some perceived question or issue that I can't decipher. Are you all that much smarter than I am? No need to answer that---it's a rhetorical question! On Tuesday,

[RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

why not match the big ring to the small cog for what will be your highest gear inches, e.g if comfortable with 104 gi, and a 11T cog, 700x32s gives a large ring of 42T (102gi). Spa Cycles in UK sells XD2 cranks with TA rings in sizes from 40 to 52 in 110mm BCD. A 42/34/24 would give maximum

[RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

In deciding on hardware most riders focus on the high and low, but it's also important to consider the shifting pattern. I have found that steps between rings of either 10 or 14 work better than 12 or 13. A shift of 10 puts you 1 rear click from the next gear and 14 is 2 clicks. Often in

Re: [RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

Steve is correct that a sequential triple works best with a narrow freewheel/cassette - you would hope any 9sp and greater cassette has narrow steps designed-in, but they usually don't - they usually have two-tooth-steps at the small cog end. I like my devised half-steps with wide rear

[RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

Sorry, but the question/statement is very vague. What specifically are you asking ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

On 06/12/2018 10:33 PM, Ron Mc wrote: I wouldn't go random about it Plug your cassette into _Mike's Gear Calculator _,

[RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

The triples Rivbike has advocated over the years is usually 26/36/46 or 24/36/46 for those XD2 models. Not sure about their Silver set. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

Add a 45 to that and you have it even better. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this

[RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

in *a good compact double *, if you work with a custom cassette (vary the rear cogs), you can accomplish the same thing On

[RBW] Re: and a triple crank?

I wouldn't go random about it Plug your cassette into *Mike's Gear Calculator * , vary your chainrings and see what you get