Cant speak personally, I only ever ran hetres on mine with 52mm fenders. It
was nice to finally fit fenders to a bike without it being a 3 hour
struggle with clearances, ill tell you that much.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Tony DeFilippo vpi...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw a reference to 52mm
.
-Original Message-
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Tony DeFilippo
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:37 AM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [RBW] double horizontal toptube Bombadil
I saw a reference to 52mm tires
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:36:41 AM UTC-4, Tony DeFilippo wrote:
I saw a reference to 52mm tires being max for these original bombadil's...
What are some of the larger tires you have successfully run on these frames?
I started out running Pacenti NeoMotos 2.3's on my later Bomba...
I believe that’s correct.
From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Nanga Parbat
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:33 PM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RBW] double horizontal toptube Bombadil
Hello,
Does anyone know the
Hmmm, this is my old bike and a lugged nitto 27.2 worked fine. I don't
think they all needed a smaller seatpost.
On Oct 22, 2014 2:33 PM, Allingham II, Thomas J
thomas.alling...@skadden.com wrote:
I believe that’s correct.
*From:* rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com [mailto:
Mine is 26.8. Double horizontal with clear powder coat.
Dan
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Goshen Peter uscpeter11...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hmmm, this is my old bike and a lugged nitto 27.2 worked fine. I don't
think they all needed a smaller seatpost.
On Oct 22, 2014 2:33 PM, Allingham II,
Yeah, mine came like that too before the re-paint but the 27.2 was fine,
never had to like jam it in or anything. I bought it off the original
owner Michael
Gillespie, maybe he knows for sure about this particular bike?
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Dan McNamara djmcnam...@gmail.com wrote:
Scott,
I have a 64m Bombadil from the first batch. The original online description
said the new frame would take a 26.8 post, but mine takes a 27.2. The frame
was built by Waterford in case that makes a difference.
David Sprunger
Fargo, ND
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Nanga Parbat
On 10/22/14, Goshen Peter uscpeter11...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, mine came like that too before the re-paint but the 27.2 was fine,
never had to like jam it in or anything. I bought it off the original
owner Michael
Gillespie, maybe he knows for sure about this particular bike?
Right Peter. I
27.2 it is. Thank you for the input.
Cheers
Scott
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:35:04 PM UTC-7, Mike Gillespie wrote:
On 10/22/14, Goshen Peter uscpet...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
Yeah, mine came like that too before the re-paint but the 27.2 was fine,
never had to like jam it in
Subject: RE: [RBW] double horizontal toptube Bombadil
Hmmm, this is my old bike and a lugged nitto 27.2 worked fine. I don't think
they all needed a smaller seatpost.
On Oct 22, 2014 2:33 PM, Allingham II, Thomas J
thomas.alling...@skadden.commailto:thomas.alling...@skadden.com wrote:
I believe
I saw a reference to 52mm tires being max for these original bombadil's... What
are some of the larger tires you have successfully run on these frames?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
12 matches
Mail list logo
