[RBW] Silver crankset not 10 speed friendly?

2017-08-15 Thread wesleya
CYB. They aren't designed for 10-speeds, though they may work perfectly well with them. I think cranksets are notorious for this. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

[RBW] 59 vs. 52 Clem L

2017-08-04 Thread wesleya
I'm on the fence. I can build up a 59 Clem L, but for a 52 I'd need to spring for the wheels. I'm 5' 10", 84 stand over, so I'm close. Can anyone point me in the right direction? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To

[RBW] Re: 59 vs. 52 Clem L

2017-08-08 Thread wesleya
I'm more than a little tempted to scoop one up. Even with the wheelset, it would be a relatively gentle introduction to the world of Riv. I've just got to see how a few things work out. Thanks again, y'all. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW

[RBW] New Clem L

2017-08-09 Thread wesleya
Nice ride! If you don't mind me asking, how tall are you? Also, that's the 52, right? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[RBW] Re: 59 vs. 52 Clem L

2017-08-06 Thread wesleya
nitto seatpost all the way > back. I like it. > > On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 8:54:22 PM UTC-4, wesleya wrote: >> >> I'm on the fence. I can build up a 59 Clem L, but for a 52 I'd need to >> spring for the wheels. I'm 5' 10", 84 stand over, so I'm close. Can anyo

[RBW] Re: 59 vs. 52 Clem L

2017-08-06 Thread wesleya
:54:22 PM UTC-4, wesleya wrote: >> >> I'm on the fence. I can build up a 59 Clem L, but for a 52 I'd need to >> spring for the wheels. I'm 5' 10", 84 stand over, so I'm close. Can anyone >> point me in the right direction? > > -- You received this message be

[RBW] Re: 59 vs. 52 Clem L

2017-08-06 Thread wesleya
Here's a picture of the 59 at what would be my saddle height. It does give me pause being so low. https://ibb.co/bMuh9v I do appreciate the advice. The top tube length is a bit tricky to compare. My brother's 54 Surly LHT clocks in at 55.5, and I could do more but 64 might be pushing it with

[RBW] Re: 59 vs. 52 Clem L

2017-08-06 Thread wesleya
Well, thanks everybody. I think I'd sleep better at night with the 52 (I can share it, I can shrink and still ride it, etc.). I don't think I'll get one just this moment, but I'll keep it on my radar. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners