On 03/01/2010 02:04 PM, Romain Francois wrote:
>
> On 03/01/2010 01:48 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>
>> On 1 March 2010 at 12:20, Romain Francois wrote:
>> | Hello,
>> |
>> | I'm starting to find the Named construct somewhat too verbose and I'd
>> | like to add some syntactic sugar.
>> |
>> | I'v
On 03/01/2010 01:48 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 1 March 2010 at 12:20, Romain Francois wrote:
> | Hello,
> |
> | I'm starting to find the Named construct somewhat too verbose and I'd
> | like to add some syntactic sugar.
> |
> | I've commited something just now. I'd like to ear opinions abo
On 1 March 2010 at 12:20, Romain Francois wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I'm starting to find the Named construct somewhat too verbose and I'd
| like to add some syntactic sugar.
|
| I've commited something just now. I'd like to ear opinions about it.
|
| The machinery is built around the classes
| Rcpp
Hello,
I'm starting to find the Named construct somewhat too verbose and I'd
like to add some syntactic sugar.
I've commited something just now. I'd like to ear opinions about it.
The machinery is built around the classes
Rcpp::internal::NamedPlaceHolder, Rcpp::internal::NamedPlaceholderProxy
