The ColDatum default constructor does not initialize any fields except
for "level". But the ColDatum *copy* constructor expects the "type"
field to be properly initialized, b/c if type is COLTYPE_FACTOR, the
copy constructor proceeds to allocate memory using the numLevels field
(which is unreliable
Le 12/03/10 22:00, Douglas Bates a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Romain Francois
> wrote:
>> Le 12/03/10 18:23, Douglas Bates a écrit :
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel
>>> wrote:
Hi Doug,
Welcome! We're honoured to have you here. An
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Romain Francois
wrote:
> Le 12/03/10 18:23, Douglas Bates a écrit :
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Doug,
>>>
>>> Welcome! We're honoured to have you here. And glad you picked the list.
>>>
>>> On 12 March 2010 at 10:
Le 12/03/10 18:23, Douglas Bates a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> Welcome! We're honoured to have you here. And glad you picked the list.
>>
>> On 12 March 2010 at 10:14, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> | I have looked at your (i.e. Dirk and Rom
Hello Doug,
Le 12/03/10 17:14, Douglas Bates a écrit :
>
> I have looked at your (i.e. Dirk and Roman's) submitted Rjournal
> article on Rcpp and decided that I should take the plunge.
>
> To get my feet wet I am starting with a relatively simple example
> interfacing to (God help us) 1960's style
On 12 March 2010 at 12:56, Douglas Bates wrote:
| I usually set the -Wall and -pedantic flags to compilations and have
| found that I pages of warnings regarding extra semi-colons from some
| of the class declarations. It would be good to remove those extra
| punctuation marks (although, I, as a
I usually set the -Wall and -pedantic flags to compilations and have
found that I pages of warnings regarding extra semi-colons from some
of the class declarations. It would be good to remove those extra
punctuation marks (although, I, as a C programmer, am continually
being caught at failing to a
On 12 March 2010 at 11:23, Douglas Bates wrote:
| Nice approach. I presume that the Pairlist object is converted to an
| VECSXP in the process of being packaged for return. I will play
| around a bit with expressions like
|
| Rcpp::List res(Rcpp::PairList(Rcpp::Named(...), ...))
Not sure if th
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Welcome! We're honoured to have you here. And glad you picked the list.
>
> On 12 March 2010 at 10:14, Douglas Bates wrote:
> | I have looked at your (i.e. Dirk and Roman's) submitted Rjournal
> | article on Rcpp and decid
Hi Doug,
Welcome! We're honoured to have you here. And glad you picked the list.
On 12 March 2010 at 10:14, Douglas Bates wrote:
| I have looked at your (i.e. Dirk and Roman's) submitted Rjournal
| article on Rcpp and decided that I should take the plunge.
|
| To get my feet wet I am starting w
I have looked at your (i.e. Dirk and Roman's) submitted Rjournal
article on Rcpp and decided that I should take the plunge.
To get my feet wet I am starting with a relatively simple example
interfacing to (God help us) 1960's style Fortran written by Mike
Powell and incorporated in the minqa packa
11 matches
Mail list logo
