I have built the following example in order to demonstrate my concern. In
reality I am obtaining an object such as the example mymat with an attached
vector as an attribute from Douglas Bates' 1998 C code for spline_basis in the
splines package. It seems that back in the days of stone knives a
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Vinh Nguyen wrote:
>> That said, it very much looks like an issue with g++ 4.7.*. I actually made a
>> small change to make it work at my end (Debian testing, g++-4.7.1).
>>
>
> Yes, g++ 4.7.* was used...
GCC versions 4.7.0 and 4.7.1 are full of bugs within the C+
On 11 July 2012 at 20:18, Jiqiang Guo wrote:
| Dear List,
|
| From some reason, my Rcpp package on windows is installed in C:/Program Files/
Not "some reason" but the [badly chosen] default of the R Windows Installer.
The R-on-Windows FAQ, as I recall, recommends NOT to install in a path with
s
Nathan,
Two more comments. First, I am not sure you can even do what you did. When I
call Rcpp.armadillo.package() as (where I omit the R file argument -- no
point including a file loading inline in a package, or redefining these
functions)
RcppArmadillo.package.skeleton(name='inlineExample'
Dear List,
>From some reason, my Rcpp package on windows is installed in C:/Program
Files/R/R-2.15.1/library/, which has a space in the path. So in the end,
when compiling cpp code using inline package, I would have the following
error, which prevent me using Rcpp at all.
Compilation argument:
On 11 July 2012 at 18:52, Bob Carpenter wrote:
| On 7/11/12 6:24 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Is there a reason this is off list? Can we please move it back?
|
| No reason --- it's just that the Rcpp list is the only
| list I use where "reply" doesn't go back to the
| list, so I keep mistaken
On 7/11/12 6:24 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Is there a reason this is off list? Can we please move it back?
No reason --- it's just that the Rcpp list is the only
list I use where "reply" doesn't go back to the
list, so I keep mistakenly replying only to Dirk.
I have an actual response inline
Hi Nathan,
On 11 July 2012 at 17:07, Nathan VanHoudnos wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| Is the appropriate place to report bugs, or should I send this somewhere else?
Sure is.
| I'm using:
|
| Package: RcppArmadillo
| Version: 0.3.2.3
| Date: $Date: 2012-06-29 20:51:46 -0500 (Fri, 29 Jun 20
Hi all,
Is the appropriate place to report bugs, or should I send this somewhere
else?
I'm using:
Package: RcppArmadillo
Version: 0.3.2.3
Date: $Date: 2012-06-29 20:51:46 -0500 (Fri, 29 Jun 2012) $
Minimal example:
#
# File : build-R-pacakge.R #
##
Further follow-up, quoting from 'Writing R Extensions':
-
1.7 Writing portable packages
=
[...]
* Do be very careful with passing arguments between R, C and FORTRAN
code. In particula
On 11 July 2012 at 16:46, Walter Mascarenhas wrote:
| Sorry if this sounds too naive (I now little about R,),
| but what is wrong with using the types
|
| uint64_t, int64_t etc
|
| which are defined in the c++ standard header ?
I like those too --- but on _32 bit Windows_ they turn into (or
Sorry if this sounds too naive (I now little about R,),
but what is wrong with using the types
uint64_t, int64_t etc
which are defined in the c++ standard header ?
walter.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Bob Carpenter wrote:
> Jiqiang created a standalone example that illustrate
Jiqiang created a standalone example that illustrates
our problem with wrapping size_t into Rcpp on Win64.
The simple example is as follows (full running dump
from R/Rcpp below):
size_t b = 100;
Rcpp::List lst(a);
lst["b"] = b;
return lst;
We found this discussion:
http://stackoverf
13 matches
Mail list logo
