Conrad aims to release Armadillo 4.100 next week. He suggested that I prepare
a pre-release of RcppArmadillo based on the current snapshot.
This is now in Github (https://github.com/RcppCore/RcppArmadillo). I started
this off in a branch which I since merged as all tests passed fine. As this
is
Hi,
Then just put fun1 and fun2 in the same file. This is yet again less work than
having two files.
Romain
Le 25 févr. 2014 à 12:45, Søren Højsgaard a écrit :
> Only because it is extra work... Anyway, I hope this
> Rcpp::interfaces(r,cpp)-feature gets up and running again :)
>
> Søren
>
Only because it is extra work... Anyway, I hope this
Rcpp::interfaces(r,cpp)-feature gets up and running again :)
Søren
-Original Message-
From: Romain François [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 25. februar 2014 12:39
To: Søren Højsgaard
Cc: [email protected]
Hello,
Why do you want to avoid writing headers. I guess you could use extern
For example, in foo1.cpp :
double fun1(){
return 2.0 ;
}
In foo2.cpp ;
extern double fun1() ;
double fun2(){
return fun1() + 2;
}
Romain
Le 25 févr. 2014 à 12:28, Søren Højsgaard a écrit :
> Dear all,
>
Dear all,
If in a package I have foo1.cpp with function fun1 and foo2.cpp with fun2
(which uses fun1 from foo1.cpp) then I must write foo1.h and include in
foo2.cpp. Right? Is there another approach so that I do not have to write these
header files?
Using Rcpp::interfaces(r,cpp) should take ca
