A new release Rcpp 0.11.3 is now on CRAN.
A short blog post about it is at
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2014/09/29#rcpp_0.11.3
and included as text (without links) below.
This release represents contributions from seven different people, which
This is a few days late, but a new RcppArmadillo hit CRAN a week week ago.
See below for a short discussion of the change in the (fallback,
Armadillo-provided) RNG which we now redirect to R (as CRAN does not like to
see use of the (knowm, bad) rand() generator in C -- even though
(Rcpp)Armadill
Hi all,
I'll throw in my two cents as well.
I personally found it confusing when I first encountered Rcpp11 some time
ago. This entirely stemmed from my lack of knowledge about the exact
distinction between C++ and C++11, and the boundary between Rcpp and C++ (I
was learning Rcpp/C++ as I went, w
If you want to have a private conversation with Dirk, just email him directly:
e...@debian.org
Now since this is all in the open, let me participate to this.
Le 29 sept. 2014 à 22:42, Jonathon Love a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> hey dirk,
>
> i was wonderi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
hey dirk,
i was wondering if you could let us know your thoughts about Rcpp11.
i've found it a little bit confusing, because at first i thought people
were just talking about Rcpp (which happens to be at version 0.11). then
i thought it was a newer
