Re: [Rcpp-devel] Package code industry request

2015-04-29 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Latchezar (Lucho) Dimitrov < [email protected]> wrote: > Well, this is half of the truth. The other part is they can make > modifications but AFAIK and IANAL all derivative work must be GPL-2 as > well. > This only applies is they distribute the package. If

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Package code industry request

2015-04-29 Thread Latchezar (Lucho) Dimitrov
Well, this is half of the truth. The other part is they can make modifications but AFAIK and IANAL all derivative work must be GPL-2 as well. The best thing to do is to refer them to GPL-2 and ask them if they accept it or not. Another best thing is to consult with FSF. Regards, Latchezar From

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Package code industry request

2015-04-29 Thread Tobias Verbeke
Hi Soeren, If you distribute the package under GPL-2, it gives the company as many freedoms as any other user of the package (freedom to study the code, to modify the code etc.) and I think that is a good thing (it is part of the definition of free [as in free speech] software). I have obviously

[Rcpp-devel] Package code industry request

2015-04-29 Thread Sören Vogel
Hello Please apologise if this is off-list. Today, a commercial company asked about numerical code and recent numerical code changes that routines of my R-package are based upon. The code is self-developed (by Carlo Albert) and based upon an algorithm to be published in a scientific article w