Hi,
Would you consider adding a convenience overload
bool containsElementNamed( const std::string & target ) const;
to the Rcpp::Vector class? The attached patch does this, chaining
down to the existing (const char *) method. It also updates the
unit test to check both overloads. Against 0
Hi Romain,
> > I've just had some trouble, on Windows with Rtools-3.0, throwing
> > exceptions from within a standalone function belonging to a module
>
> I have commited adding BEGIN_RCPP and END_RCPP.
> Could you have a go at testing it on Windows.
I don't have SVN access through the firewall h
Hi Romain,
Thanks for looking at this.
> > [...] do you think adding BEGIN_RCPP / END_RCPP pairs in all of the
> > CppFunction-derived classes would be acceptable [...] ?
> If I apply your suggestion to the generator file and it does not break
> existing code (i.e. as defined by our unit tests),
Hi,
Minor typo in the macro UNPACK_EXTERNAL_ARGS in Module.cpp; all existing
callers don't notice because they use the variable 'p' but it might trip
someone up in future.
Thanks,
Ben.
- - - - 8< - - - - [Also attached in case email mangles whitespace.]
diff -rU4 Rcpp-orig/src/Module.cpp Rcpp-
Hi,
I've just had some trouble, on Windows with Rtools-3.0, throwing
exceptions from within a standalone function belonging to a module:
- - - - 8< - - - - crash.cpp
#include
#include
int calculate(int x)
{
throw std::invalid_argument("x is invalid");
}
RCPP_MODULE(Crash)
{
Rcpp::fun
Minor typo fix. (In case the patch gets mangled, line 449 of wrap.h
should emit a debug string including "true" rather than "false".)
--- Rcpp-orig/inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h 2013-03-20 19:00:56.0
+
+++ Rcpp/inst/include/Rcpp/internal/wrap.h 2013-05-17 11:45:53.978029200
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Here is the self-contained example I asked for.
>
> And yes, it crashes for me too. So let's not create 1e6 temp matrices.
> Until someone has time to debug memory management internals. Which is
> really hard, so this may not get
