Good luck to you too...
bye,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 30 March 2013 at 19:50, Walter Mascarenhas wrote:
> | leftover from the use of an old version of RInside (dowloaded
> | by apt-get) and a new version from your site. Therefore,
Dirk,
The difficulties I had were indeed self inflicted, due to the
same kind of distraction that lead me to click "reply" instead
of "replay to all" a couple of times. They should not affect
other people because they are a combination of the
leftover from the use of an old version of RInside (d
30, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Walter Mascarenhas <
> walter.mascaren...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> >> "distributed LibRInside.a" ?
>> >> Fist off, you have the capitalization wrong. Second, how am I
>> supposed to
>> >> know how YOU built t
side)
root@linux:/usr/local/lib/R/site-library/RInside# ls
DESCRIPTION examples help html include INDEX liblibs Meta
NAMESPACE NEWS.RdR RInside_0.2.10.tar.gz THANKS
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Walter,
>
> On 30 March 20
works fine there, did you consider linking
against each one of the THREE version of libRInside: /lib/libRInside.a,
/lib/libRInside.so and
/libs/libRInside.o?
walter.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 29 March 2013 at 22:13, Walter Mascar
Dirk,
SInce I wrote you this afternoon, I upgraded to R 2.15.3 and got version
0.10.3 of rcpp and
0.2.10 of Rinside. I am using ubuntu 12.04 LTS, with g++4.7.2 and Qt 5.0.1
in Qt creator 2.6.2
(the first few lines of the makefile generated by qmake are at the end of
this message)
Now rinsides
Romain,
what about "join"?
walter.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Andreas Alfons
wrote:
> Hi Romain,
>
> "bind" may be confusing to R users, because "cbind" and "rbind" exist
> in R and return matrices. In my opinion, "combine" is a better option.
>
> - Andreas
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 13,
I don't mean to come down hard on you personally, but consider that
listening to criticism is a good way to keep a balanced view of things.
It is natural for you to defend rcpp and your views on R and C++,
However I do believe Gabor points are also relevant, in the same
way that Knuth, Linus
Hi,
If you could pick any compiler you wanted,
which one would you choose to use with rcpp?
walter.
___
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-de
Sorry if this sounds too naive (I now little about R,),
but what is wrong with using the types
uint64_t, int64_t etc
which are defined in the c++ standard header ?
walter.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Bob Carpenter wrote:
> Jiqiang created a standalone example that illustrate
10 matches
Mail list logo
