On 21 March 2013 at 10:55, Hadley Wickham wrote:
| > Should I expect the results to match? Why do fastLmProto and fastLm produce
| > a single fitted parameter (I would expect two)? Why are they different? Am I
| > doing something wrong here, or just being naïve in my assumptions?
|
| Hint:
|
| >
e
Cc: rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] [rcpp-devel] Rcpp Gallery Example fastLm vs R native
lm
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Smith, Dale wrote:
> I have a question about the fastLm example in the Gallery
> http://gallery.rcpp.org/articles/fast-linear-
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Smith, Dale wrote:
> I have a question about the fastLm example in the Gallery
> http://gallery.rcpp.org/articles/fast-linear-model-with-armadillo/. I put
> the code directly into my package (after renaming it fastLmProto so I don’t
> mask the RcppArmadillo functi
I have a question about the fastLm example in the Gallery
http://gallery.rcpp.org/articles/fast-linear-model-with-armadillo/. I put the
code directly into my package (after renaming it fastLmProto so I don't mask
the RcppArmadillo function by the same name). After building the package, I
wanted
