Re: [Rcpp-devel] Avoiding having to write .h files

2014-02-25 Thread Romain François
> Søren > > -Original Message- > From: Romain François [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 25. februar 2014 12:39 > To: Søren Højsgaard > Cc: [email protected] ([email protected]) > Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] Avoiding ha

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Avoiding having to write .h files

2014-02-25 Thread Søren Højsgaard
([email protected]) Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] Avoiding having to write .h files Hello, Why do you want to avoid writing headers. I guess you could use extern For example, in foo1.cpp : double fun1(){ return 2.0 ; } In foo2.cpp ; extern double fun1() ; double fun2

Re: [Rcpp-devel] Avoiding having to write .h files

2014-02-25 Thread Romain François
Hello, Why do you want to avoid writing headers. I guess you could use extern For example, in foo1.cpp : double fun1(){ return 2.0 ; } In foo2.cpp ; extern double fun1() ; double fun2(){ return fun1() + 2; } Romain Le 25 févr. 2014 à 12:28, Søren Højsgaard a écrit : > Dear all, >

[Rcpp-devel] Avoiding having to write .h files

2014-02-25 Thread Søren Højsgaard
Dear all, If in a package I have foo1.cpp with function fun1 and foo2.cpp with fun2 (which uses fun1 from foo1.cpp) then I must write foo1.h and include in foo2.cpp. Right? Is there another approach so that I do not have to write these header files? Using Rcpp::interfaces(r,cpp) should take ca