Darren,
That's an awesome answer!
Thank you very much
--
Noah Silverman
UCLA Department of Statistics
8117 Math Sciences Building
Los Angeles, CA 90095
On Sep 7, 2011, at 6:04 PM, Darren Cook wrote:
>> If the code was in pure C++, it would be trivial to have an object
>> and then just pas
> If the code was in pure C++, it would be trivial to have an object
> and then just pass a pointer to that object. I can't figure out how
> to do the same thing with R+Rcpp+inline.
I asked myself a similar question a few weeks back (actually it came
from one of the questions at the end of the go
Awesome.
Thank You!
--
Noah Silverman
UCLA Department of Statistics
8117 Math Sciences Building #8208
Los Angeles, CA 90095
On Sep 7, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Noah Silverman wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> Maybe I didn't explain it well enough. The question absolutely pertains to
> using the inline functionalit
Dirk,
Maybe I didn't explain it well enough. The question absolutely pertains to
using the inline functionality.
As each new data arrives, I want to pass it to my C++ function. If this were a
pure C++ implementation, then I would just append an STL vector and pass a
pointer of that vector to
On 7 September 2011 at 14:46, Noah Silverman wrote:
| Hi,
|
|
| I'm writing a function using Rcpp through inline. This function will be a
| filter on an incoming data stream.
|
| I need to keep the past several data values so that they are accessible to the
| function each time it is called.
Hi,
I'm writing a function using Rcpp through inline. This function will be a
filter on an incoming data stream.
I need to keep the past several data values so that they are accessible to the
function each time it is called. This is easy to do with a data structure in
R (and then passing
