Hi Alessandro,
Briefly-ish as I am at work:
On 3 February 2014 at 19:17, Alessandro Mammana wrote:
| Hi all,
| once again I have a bug and no idea what I am doing wrong.
| I started to handle optional arguments directly at the C++ level, so
| that I don't have to write a wrapper function in R. T
When I run this (with latest CRAN Rcpp, 0.11.0), I get the error:
Error: index out of bounds
My best guess: you are casting things to SEXP, which removes the
protection guarantees that Rcpp offers you, and so these objects are
getting gc'ed without you expecting it.
IIUC, casting with (SEXP)
Hi all,
once again I have a bug and no idea what I am doing wrong.
I started to handle optional arguments directly at the C++ level, so
that I don't have to write a wrapper function in R. The pattern below
has always worked so far, but today it crashed. It was very hard to
reproduce, It took ages t