On 7 April 2015 at 14:51, JJ Allaire wrote:
| I think that header-only packages (where possible) are definitely
| preferable within the R package ecosystem because it allows you to
| sidestep a lot of build configuration and runtime linking complexity.
|
| The rub is that some libraries simply ca
I would definitely second that. This eliminates a whole class of hard to deal
with issues.
Even Rcpp IMO should really just be header only.
Romain
Envoyé de mon iPhone
> Le 7 avr. 2015 à 20:51, JJ Allaire a écrit :
>
> I think that header-only packages (where possible) are definitely
> pre
I think that header-only packages (where possible) are definitely
preferable within the R package ecosystem because it allows you to
sidestep a lot of build configuration and runtime linking complexity.
The rub is that some libraries simply can't be made header-only,
especially if they make use of
This is probably the best place I can think of to ask this question if
perhaps not completely on topic. Some quick context:
I am exploring GPGPU computing and with my 'open-source' mindset I quickly
gravitated to using OpenCL. Thankfully, many wonderful programmers have
already begun creating li
