On 20 November 2014 at 19:04, Christian Authmann wrote:
| > I would really much prefer if you could alter the pull request and change
the
| > licensing.
|
| Can do for the final pull request after review.
I think I would like to change that in the pull request.
Code review is light. It is all
On 11/20/2014 05:41 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> Does the client code use R code to (de-)serialize R objects?
It's right in the code :-)
TL;DR: It doesn't. The code only serializes generic types (int,
std::string, std::vector, ..) and user-defined classes with their
own serialization methods,
Hi Christian,
On 20 November 2014 at 17:10, Christian Authmann wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I don't want to get into lengthy legal discussions (I'm a programmer,
| not a lawyer), but let me just state my intent.
|
| From the way I read the GPL-FAQ
| > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
| the GP
Hello,
I don't want to get into lengthy legal discussions (I'm a programmer,
not a lawyer), but let me just state my intent.
From the way I read the GPL-FAQ
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
the GPL2 only applies to derivative work and linking.
Which means that the client, which is w
---Original Message-
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [mailto:e...@debian.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 10:38 AM
To: Smith, Dale (Norcross)
Cc: Dirk Eddelbuettel; Christian Authmann; rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
Subject: RE: [Rcpp-devel] Review request: Sandboxed R integration via RInside
On 20 November 2014 at 15:25, Smith, Dale (Norcross) wrote:
| I never distributed my work and don't now.
Same with what I do at work (as opposed to what I do as a private person in
the Open Source commons). And I don't talk about what I do at work either.
So your entire point of what _Christi
n; rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
Subject: RE: [Rcpp-devel] Review request: Sandboxed R integration via RInside
On 20 November 2014 at 14:28, Smith, Dale (Norcross) wrote:
| I've always had licensing concerns with RInside. I preferred Rserve and it
worked well for our purposes years ago.
|
| Th
t's Next NowSM Campaign
|
| -Original Message-
| From: rcpp-devel-boun...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
[mailto:rcpp-devel-boun...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at] On Behalf Of Dirk Eddelbuettel
| Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:14 AM
| To: Christian Authmann
| Cc: rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.
ann
Cc: rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at
Subject: Re: [Rcpp-devel] Review request: Sandboxed R integration via RInside
On 20 November 2014 at 14:58, Christian Authmann wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I've developed a solution to integrate R into an application in a
| safer way than the direct inte
On 20 November 2014 at 14:58, Christian Authmann wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I've developed a solution to integrate R into an application in a safer
| way than the direct integration provided by RInside. It is conceptually
| similar to RServe: the application does not link to R, but communicates
| wit
Hello,
I've developed a solution to integrate R into an application in a safer
way than the direct integration provided by RInside. It is conceptually
similar to RServe: the application does not link to R, but communicates
with a different process where R is running. Securing the separate
pro
11 matches
Mail list logo
