On 02/13/2010 07:50 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 13 February 2010 at 19:28, Romain Francois wrote:
> | On 02/13/2010 07:21 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |> On 13 February 2010 at 18:08, Romain Francois wrote:
> |> | Anyone familiar with boost asio here ?
> |> | http://www.boost.org/doc/lib
On 13 February 2010 at 19:28, Romain Francois wrote:
| On 02/13/2010 07:21 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 13 February 2010 at 18:08, Romain Francois wrote:
| > | Anyone familiar with boost asio here ?
| > | http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_42_0/doc/html/boost_asio.html
| >
| > I have not used
On 02/13/2010 07:21 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> On 13 February 2010 at 18:08, Romain Francois wrote:
> | Anyone familiar with boost asio here ?
> | http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_42_0/doc/html/boost_asio.html
>
> I have not used asio but using more of boost is always a good idea. Would add
> an
On 13 February 2010 at 18:08, Romain Francois wrote:
| Anyone familiar with boost asio here ?
| http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_42_0/doc/html/boost_asio.html
I have not used asio but using more of boost is always a good idea. Would add
another (weak) build dependency though.
| Now that new Rcpp
Hi,
Anyone familiar with boost asio here ?
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_42_0/doc/html/boost_asio.html
Now that new Rcpp is getting stable, I'd like to use it. One potential
use is making some sort of web server with R callbacks, and I was
thinking maybe boost asio was the way to go about it.
