On 18 March 2010 at 13:50, Romain Francois wrote:
| I will. Note that you still did not reply to the original question,
| which is what the name should be, and you are usually the one with
| opinions on these matters (e.g. you don't like make_list).
create() works well for me. Classes as nouns
Le 18/03/10 13:37, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
>
> On 18 March 2010 at 13:16, Romain Francois wrote:
> | Le 18/03/10 12:55, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
> |> | I am very happy about the make_list templates, but it only handles
> |> | lists, and the next best thing would be having something that wo
On 18 March 2010 at 13:16, Romain Francois wrote:
| Le 18/03/10 12:55, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
| > | I am very happy about the make_list templates, but it only handles
| > | lists, and the next best thing would be having something that would
| > | handle all sorts of vectors.
| >
| > My first
Le 18/03/10 12:55, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
>
> Hi Romain,
>
> On 18 March 2010 at 12:22, Romain Francois wrote:
> | Hello,
> |
> | I am very happy about the make_list templates, but it only handles
> | lists, and the next best thing would be having something that would
> | handle all sorts of v
Hi Romain,
On 18 March 2010 at 12:22, Romain Francois wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I am very happy about the make_list templates, but it only handles
| lists, and the next best thing would be having something that would
| handle all sorts of vectors.
My first question would be "Why exactly?" We have
Hello,
I am very happy about the make_list templates, but it only handles
lists, and the next best thing would be having something that would
handle all sorts of vectors.
With some imagination, I think we can achieve this, but I was wondering
what the interface should be like. I was thinking m
