Hi Gregor, Dirk,
Added here:
https://github.com/RcppCore/Rcpp/commit/f6e7e34b94ba52c1341142a5640d0ede674073c7
Please feel free to tweak for wording / style / clarity :)
Kevin
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 24 March 2014 at 16:45, Kevin Ushey wrote:
> | Hi Gre
On 24 March 2014 at 16:45, Kevin Ushey wrote:
| Hi Gregor,
|
| This is probably worth a reminder as you say. Just for reference, the
| motivation is that R's internal computations for rexp and rgamma
| default to the 'scale' parameterization, rather than the 'rate'
| parameterization seen at the
Hi Gregor,
This is probably worth a reminder as you say. Just for reference, the
motivation is that R's internal computations for rexp and rgamma
default to the 'scale' parameterization, rather than the 'rate'
parameterization seen at the R level. Rcpp uses that internal
operation and hence isn't
Dear all,
I believe it's the second time I just realized that Rcpp::rgamma() behaves
differently than to R's rgamma() when called without named arguments:
** BEGIN code.R **
library(Rcpp)
cppFunction('
SEXP rgamma2(const int n, const double a, const double b) {
RNGSc
