Re: [Rcpp-devel] IntegerVector initialization

2012-01-15 Thread Romain François
Le 12/01/12 11:29, Gregor Kastner a écrit : This is a minor thing but caused some confusion to me: IntegerVector foo1(2, 4.0); // works IntegerVector foo2(2, 4);// throws error while IntegerVector bar1 = IntegerVector::create(4.0, 4.0); // works IntegerVector bar2 = IntegerVector::create

Re: [Rcpp-devel] IntegerVector initialization

2012-01-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 13 January 2012 at 00:28, Gregor Kastner wrote: | > | This is a minor thing but caused some confusion to me: | > | | > | IntegerVector foo1(2, 4.0); // works | > | IntegerVector foo2(2, 4);// throws error | > | > What were you expecting with the second argument? A 'fill' value? | > Argu

Re: [Rcpp-devel] IntegerVector initialization

2012-01-12 Thread Gregor Kastner
> | This is a minor thing but caused some confusion to me: > | > | IntegerVector foo1(2, 4.0); // works > | IntegerVector foo2(2, 4);// throws error > > What were you expecting with the second argument? A 'fill' value? > Arguably, int should then work. Yes, inspired by // ... with a defau

Re: [Rcpp-devel] IntegerVector initialization

2012-01-12 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 12 January 2012 at 11:29, Gregor Kastner wrote: | This is a minor thing but caused some confusion to me: | | IntegerVector foo1(2, 4.0); // works | IntegerVector foo2(2, 4);// throws error What were you expecting with the second argument? A 'fill' value? Arguably, int should then work.