On 17 April 2014 at 09:24, Romain François wrote:
| Now, as Dirk says, you can use C++11 with Rcpp. Just as much as you can use
C++11 with vanilla .Call/.C.
Yes of course.
As R in a C program, and as .C (no SEXP) and .Call (SEXP interface) are C
interfaces, Rcpp and Rcpp11 are in the exact sa
Le 17 avr. 2014 à 09:42, Hao Ye a écrit :
> Hi Romain,
>
> Thanks for the explanation -- I was curious about the difference between Rcpp
> and Rcpp11, as well.
>
> What might help you deciding is that in Rcpp11, we did not retain some
> features such as modules and date/time related classes
Hello,
(may contains traces of personal opinions)
My motivation for starting Rcpp11 were:
- Assuming C++11, which is nicer to use and teach. Rcpp still wants to be
compatible with older standard, which essentially means that even if I write
something new using C++11, I still have to figure ou
Dear all,
My understanding is that Rcpp11 will employ features of c++11 (which is very
nice) but other than that it is not clear to me how Rcpp and Rcpp11 relate to
each other? Can I start to use Rcpp11 with my existing Rcpp-based packages or
is Rcpp and Rcpp11 branching off in different directi
