Hi Ulrich,
On 6 August 2011 at 06:40, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote:
| Dear Dirk,
|
| Thanks for your detailed comments!
|
| Regarding the first question: as I wrote, I was actually assuming that
| Rcpp would not make deep copies.
What we now all RcppClassic always copied deeply. That's how it was
Le 06/08/11 06:40, Ulrich Bodenhofer a écrit :
Dear Dirk,
Thanks for your detailed comments!
Regarding the first question: as I wrote, I was actually assuming that
Rcpp would not make deep copies.
[...]
See this variant:
R> fun<- cxxfunction(signature(mat="numeric"), plugin="Rcpp", body='
+
Dear Dirk,
Thanks for your detailed comments!
Regarding the first question: as I wrote, I was actually assuming that
Rcpp would not make deep copies.
[...]
See this variant:
R> fun<- cxxfunction(signature(mat="numeric"), plugin="Rcpp", body='
+ Rcpp::NumericMatrix matC(mat);
+ Rcp
Hi Ulrich,
These are really several questions. I'll try to address them all, with some
luck maybe Romain, Doug, Christian, ... will correct or complement as needed.
On 5 August 2011 at 11:45, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote:
| Dear list members,
|
| I have started developing a package using the latest