On 27 September 2013 at 11:28, Romain Francois wrote:
| It might be worth handling this internally. The object could carry with
| it its definition and compile itself if the pointer is the null pointer,
| which is what you get apparently.
|
| Unless things have evolved in R, there is no way to
Le 27/09/13 00:20, Matteo Fasiolo a écrit :
Thanks a lot for your replies, I will go for the package solution, given
that
I'm organizing all my code in a package in any case.
Matteo
That's the preferred approach.
It might now however give you the flexibility of passing arbitrary
functions at
Thanks a lot for your replies, I will go for the package solution, given
that
I'm organizing all my code in a package in any case.
Matteo
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Romain Francois
wrote:
> The usual way is to put the function in a package and load the package.
>
> Otherwise, you could do
The usual way is to put the function in a package and load the package.
Otherwise, you could do something along these lines
auto_function <- function( code, ... ){
dots <- list(code, ...)
function(...){
do.call( cppFunction, dots )( ... )
}
}
This way the function knows how
On 26 September 2013 at 17:57, Matteo Fasiolo wrote:
| Given that I have just started parallelizing my algorithms in this
| way, any suggestion/criticism about the overall approach is
| more then welcome!
One solution (which I favour) is to organize your in packages, and to have
each node load t
