Re: [Rcpp-devel] inline plug-in linking

2012-11-17 Thread Ian Fellows
Thanks for the help. I just thought I should report back with the solution to my issues for posterity. It seems that the header only interface is the way to go for my purposes because I only have a few data structures which need to be shared across compilation units, and almost all of the code

Re: [Rcpp-devel] inline plug-in linking

2012-11-16 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Wow, that was terrible. Once again, now proofread and edited. On 16 November 2012 at 08:50, JJ Allaire wrote: | Anyhow, I think I am probably missing some linking info from my | inlinePlugIn statement. | | | This is the key -- plugins that do linking are much more complicated than ones

Re: [Rcpp-devel] inline plug-in linking

2012-11-16 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 16 November 2012 at 08:50, JJ Allaire wrote: | Anyhow, I think I am probably missing some linking info from my | inlinePlugIn statement. | | | This is the key -- plugins that do linking are much more complicated than ones | that rely on headers only. You can look at the Rcpp and RcppG

Re: [Rcpp-devel] inline plug-in linking

2012-11-16 Thread JJ Allaire
> > Anyhow, I think I am probably missing some linking info from my > inlinePlugIn statement. > This is the key -- plugins that do linking are much more complicated than ones that rely on headers only. You can look at the Rcpp and RcppGSL packages as examples -- in short there needs to be a functi