On 6 January 2011 at 00:17, Christian Gunning wrote:
| Attached is a small diff to the RcppDE vignette. I added 2 well-cited
| primary lit papers that are helpful (and internet available)
| introductions to DE. While I was at it, I ran the doc through the
| spell-checker :).
Lovely! Thanks for
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> On looking more closely at the output, I thought that the problem may
>> arise in loading the Rcpp package because that is when the function
>> init_Rcpp_cache() is evaluated. So I ran
First, is this an appropriate way to report issues with Rcpp and RInside?
Second, I'd like to commend all developers for your fine work in supporting the
R environment, especially through the Rcpp and RInside packages.
I've updated both versions on an up-to-date Fedora Core 13 machine and they
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>>> On looking more closely at the output, I thought that the problem may
>>> arise in loading the Rcpp package because that is when
My mail server didn't like the attached installation script - I've resent it
with the script header removed.
From: rcpp-devel-boun...@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
[rcpp-devel-boun...@lists.r-forge.r-project.org] On Behalf Of Steve Moffitt
[smoff...@whtradi
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Steve Moffitt wrote:
> My mail server didn't like the attached installation script - I've resent it
> with the script header removed.
>
> From: rcpp-devel-boun...@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> [rcpp-devel-boun...@lists.r-f
Hi Steve,
Welcome to the list.
On 6 January 2011 at 12:35, Steve Moffitt wrote:
| First, is this an appropriate way to report issues with Rcpp and RInside?
Very much so.
| Second, I'd like to commend all developers for your fine work in supporting
the R environment, especially through the
On 6 January 2011 at 13:10, Douglas Bates wrote:
| On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Steve Moffitt wrote:
| > My mail server didn't like the attached installation script - I've resent
it with the script header removed.
| >
| > From: rcpp-devel-boun...@list
In the continuing saga ...
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
On looking more closely at the output, I
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> In the continuing saga ...
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Dougl
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>> In the continuing saga ...
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Douglas Bates wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Douglas Bates wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Dou
I finally managed to get an example from the Rcpp documentation to fail for me.
Rcpp_module_class_error.R
Description: Binary data
Rcpp_module_class_error.Rout
Description: Binary data
___
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
The Module function in Module.R is mysterious because it is not clear from
the code itself or from the docs that the second argument can be a DLLInfo,
yet that is what appears in your example. Also, this function is re-entered
for the same object, with different logic each time. When the module
par
13 matches
Mail list logo
