Hi Dirk,
Thanks for the comments. Suppose if I were to go with your third
suggestion, do you happen to have any examples of RcppArmadillo calling
SEXP functions that I can refer to?
In the past, I tried (1) putting the set of MASS functions in a separate
MASS.cpp file, (2) creating a header file
Hi Kevin,
For me the -O2 flag did the trick. I verified it multiple times. Just remove
the -O2 and the code segfaults while initializing RInside, add the -O2 flag and
everybody is happy. It is weird.
I cannot reproduce it independently of RInside because the segfault occurs when
RInside is bei
On 4 September 2014 at 12:13, Pratibha Rana wrote:
| For me the -O2 flag did the trick. I verified it multiple times. Just remove
| the -O2 and the code segfaults while initializing RInside, add the -O2 flag
and
| everybody is happy. It is weird.
Makes no sense, apart from maybe revealing a race
I tried with the create() as well and I had the same issue, so I just
tried to simplify the code as much as possible to get down to the root.
It was not just the dataframe, function execution was also causing
problem. Here is another snippet which was causing the segfault. Again
just adding the -O2
Doxygen is so useful because it’s automatically generated. Keeping up with
additions or changes with hand-crafted API documentation is not easy.
You should at least include a link to the Rcpp Gallery.
http://gallery.rcpp.org/
I’d prefer detailed documentation for the unit tests as they are very
On 4 September 2014 at 12:57, Pratibha Rana wrote:
| I tried with the create() as well and I had the same issue, so I just
| tried to simplify the code as much as possible to get down to the root.
| It was not just the dataframe, function execution was also causing
| problem. Here is another snipp
This is tremendously helpful and exactly what is needed. Thank you for
putting that together.
THK
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Yixuan Qiu wrote:
> Dear all,
> I believe that everyone in this list has seen the benefit of using Rcpp to
> incorporate C++ code and develop R packages, but it's
It will be great, however, it is too hard to maintain a hand-crafted
document.
Rcpp is changing really rapidly.
For users who really need to know all the details of every class, I believe
they are comfortable with Doxygen.
For other users, the detailed documents for examples and testing may be
m
I try to get the Rcpp.package.skeleton example running.
Rcpp.package.skeleton('GeneticsHaplotype', module = T);
My zzz.R looks like:
.onLoad <- function(libname, pkgname){
#loadRcppModules()
loadModule("yada", TRUE)
}
I also tried various variations (as indicated by the comments in zzz.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Qiang Kou wrote:
> It will be great, however, it is too hard to maintain a hand-crafted
> document.
>
> Rcpp is changing really rapidly.
>
> For users who really need to know all the details of every class, I
> believe they are comfortable with Doxygen.
>
Or perha
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Yixuan Qiu wrote:
> Dear all,
> I believe that everyone in this list has seen the benefit of using Rcpp to
> incorporate C++ code and develop R packages, but it's also the fact that
> currently there is rarely a complete reference which documents every detail
> of
On 4 September 2014 at 18:28, Stefan Boehringer wrote:
| I try to get the Rcpp.package.skeleton example running.
My favourite approach for cases like this is to look at existing / working
packages. We do have an example in the unit tests set in
inst/unitTests/testRcppModule/
and it
On 4 September 2014 at 11:58, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 4 September 2014 at 18:28, Stefan Boehringer wrote:
| | I try to get the Rcpp.package.skeleton example running.
|
| My favourite approach for cases like this is to look at existing / working
| packages. We do have an example in the u
I'm no expert here, but Armadillo does have built in QR decomposition <
http://arma.sourceforge.net/docs.html#qr> and sorting <
http://arma.sourceforge.net/docs.html#sort> routines. Perhaps you can use
those and dispense with the need for importing anything else?
Avi
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:30
Hi all,
I do appreciate your kind suggestions, and will definitely take Doxygen
into account. The reason why I'm not using it at the moment is that I could
be freer to organize the structure of a manually edited document, and
that's why I titled this project as "Rcpp Notes". It's a kind of draft at
15 matches
Mail list logo
