I've outlined a wishlist item for a modern Rcpp wrapper for the NetCDF
library:
https://github.com/RConsortium/wishlist/issues/3
I'd appreciate any advice from those with Rcpp expertise and knowledge of
wrapping external libraries.
Does NetCDF look particularly difficult to work with? Or, would
Does it need to be NetCDF, or can you settle for HDF5? There are a couple of
HDF5 packages available.
> On Dec 16, 2016, at 8:55 PM, Michael Sumner wrote:
>
> I've outlined a wishlist item for a modern Rcpp wrapper for the NetCDF
> library:
>
> https://github.com/RConsortium/wishlist/issues
On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 at 13:34 Sean Davis wrote:
> Does it need to be NetCDF, or can you settle for HDF5? There are a couple
> of HDF5 packages available.
>
>
I find HDF5 is way too raw, so you're always writing abstractions from
scratch - but that might be the best way. I haven't seen an HDF5 R
On 16 December 2016 at 21:34, Sean Davis wrote:
| Does it need to be NetCDF, or can you settle for HDF5? There are a couple of
| HDF5 packages available.
Yep.
Also, Rcpp is not that opionated about other libraries.
The net result is "what you make it". Maybe the discussion about this should
b
